Immunopeptidomics Workflow for Isolation and LC-MS/MS Analysis of MHC Class I-Bound Peptides Under Hypoxic Conditions

Materials and reagents

Biological materials

Cancer cell lines are grown in culture using adequate media and maintained in humidified incubators at 37 °C with 5% CO₂. Caution: Routine validation of cell line identity (STR profiling) and mycoplasma testing is strongly recommended.

Reagents

Critical: Use only LC-MS-grade water, solvents, and high-purity reagents in all procedures. All glassware must be thoroughly cleaned with LC-MS-grade solvents (e.g., methanol) and LC-MS-grade water before use. Both glassware and plasticware can release polymeric contaminants, plasticizers, or detergent residues that interfere with peptide detection in LC-MS/MS analyses. To minimize such contamination, employ ultraclean glassware and high-quality, low-extractable plasticware. We strongly recommend verifying all tubes and consumables for leachable compounds before use. Where indicated, prepare solutions fresh before each experiment and discard any remaining solutions after no more than one week of storage. Use glass bottles for solution storage to reduce the risk of polymeric contaminants that can accumulate over time.

1. Formic acid (LC-MS ultra, >98% purity) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 10596814)

2. Acetic acid (glacial; HPLC-grade) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 10365020)

3. Acetonitrile (ACN) (LC-MS-grade) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 1.00029.2500)

4. Water (LC-MS-grade) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 1.15333.2500)

5. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (LC-MS-grade) [Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 10723857 (A116-50)]

Caution: TFA is corrosive; wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) accordingly. Buffers should be prepared in a fume hood due to the risk of toxic emissions.

6. Dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: D8388-250MG)

7. Complete protease inhibitor (Roche, catalog number: 11836145001)

8. IGEPAL^® CA 630 (Abcam, catalog number: ab285400)

9. 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 46-034-CI)

10. Protein A resin (Abcam, catalog number: ab270308-200mL)

11. Protein G resin (Abcam, catalog number: ab270309-100mL)

Critical: Check the isotype of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) to be used, as protein G resin may be more appropriate (e.g., for the IgG1 isotype). Refer to Table 1 for detailed information on the most commonly used anti-human antibodies.

Table 1. Commonly used anti-human antibodies for immunoaffinity capture of MHC-peptide complexes

12. PBS (1×, sterile) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: J61196.AP)

13. H₃BO₃ (boric acid), pH 5.1 (25 °C, 1.8 g/L) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: B6768-500G)

14. Potassium chloride (KCl) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: P9541-500G)

15. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: S8045-500G)

16. Sodium chloride (NaCl) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 31434-1KG-M)

17. Tris, ultra-pure grade (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: T6066-1KG)

18. pan MHC I antibody clone W6/32 (produced in house, hybridoma cells HB-95)

19. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Gibco, catalog number: 10313021)

20. Fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: F7524-500ML)

21. Penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 15070063)

22. 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: T3924)

23. Purified mouse anti-human GRP78 (BD Biosciences, catalog number: 610978)

24. Purified mouse and-human HIF-1α (BD Biosciences, catalog number: 610959)

25. Goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (Licor Biosciences, catalog number: IRDye800RD)

26. LICOR blocking buffer (Licor Biosciences, catalog number: 927-60003)

27. 10 well, 50 μL gels (4%–20%) (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 4561094)

28. 12 well, 20 μL gels (4%–20%) (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 4561095)

29. Turbo Transfer kit (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 1704270)

30. Western Blot protein ladder (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 1610374)

Solutions

1. Boric acid-KCl stock solution (see Recipes)

2. Borate wash buffer (see Recipes)

3. Dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP) cross-linker (see Recipes)

4. Termination buffer (see Recipes)

5. 2× Lysis buffer (see Recipes)

6. Wash buffer 1 (see Recipes)

7. Wash buffer 2 (see Recipes)

8. Wash buffer 3 (see Recipes)

9. Wash buffer 4 (see Recipes)

10. 10% (v/v) acetic acid (see Recipes)

11. 1 M NaOH (see Recipes)

12. 0.1 M NaOH (see Recipes)

13. 1 M Tris, pH 8.0 (see Recipes)

14. 20% ACN 0.1% TFA (see Recipes)

15. 80% ACN 0.1% TFA (see Recipes)

16. 50% ACN 0.1% TFA (see Recipes)

17. 1% ACN 0.1% TFA (see Recipes)

18. 0.1% TFA (see Recipes)

19. Mass spectrometry loading buffer (see Recipes)

Recipes

1. Boric acid-KCl stock solution

2. Borate wash buffer

3. Dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP) cross-linker

Prepare 40 mM DMP by dissolving 250 mg of DMP in 8 mL of borate wash buffer. Adjust the pH to 9.0 with 1 M NaOH. Top up to 25 mL with borate wash buffer. Prepare this solution fresh, immediately before use.

Critical: DMP powder can be stored at -20 °C; however, prolonged storage or repeated freeze–thaw cycles may reduce its cross-linking efficiency. To avoid stability issues, we recommend using single-use 250 mg vials, which are sufficient to crosslink up to 20 mg of antibody to 2 mL of resin.

4. Termination buffer

5. 2× Lysis buffer

Critical: 2× lysis buffer can be stored at 4 °C for 1–2 weeks. For optimal reproducibility, mix thoroughly before use and prepare fresh buffer if longer storage is required.

Add the protease inhibitor cocktail before use; dissolve one tablet in 10 mL of lysis buffer. Add phosphatase inhibitor if required (PhosStop, Roche) before use (1 tablet/10 mL of lysis buffer). Keep the lysis buffer cold.

6. Wash buffer 1

7. Wash buffer 2

8. Wash buffer 3

9. Wash buffer 4

10. 10% (v/v) acetic acid

11. 1 M NaOH

12. 0.1 M NaOH

13. 1 M Tris, pH 8.0

Adjust pH with HCl; approximately 42 mL of HCl is needed to achieve pH 8.0.

14. 20% ACN 0.1% TFA

15. 80% ACN 0.1% TFA

16. 50% ACN 0.1% TFA

17. 1% ACN 0.1% TFA

18. 0.1% TFA

19. Mass spectrometry loading buffer

Laboratory supplies

1. Petri dish, Duroplan, borosilicate glass, diameter: 143 mm, height: 30 mm (VWR International, catalog number: 391-0860)

2. 150 mm TC dish, sterile, non-pyrogenic (Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 11804125)

3. TC cell scraper (Sarstedt, catalog number: 83.3951)

4. 10 μL filter pipette tips, hinged, extended length, graduated (Appleton Woods, catalog number: ACA619)

5. 20 μL filter pipette tips, hinged, extended length, graduated (Appleton Woods, catalog number: ACA626)

6. 200 μL filter pipette tips, hinged, extended length, graduated (Appleton Woods, catalog number: ACA659)

7. 1,250 μL filter pipette tips, hinged, extended length, graduated (Appleton Woods, catalog number: ACA668)

8. Protein LoBind tube 1.5 mL, PCR clean (Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 10708704)

9. Protein LoBind tube 2 mL, PCR clean (Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 10718874)

10. Econo-Column^® chromatography columns (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 737-1012)

11. Ultrafree^®-MC centrifugal filter units (Merck, catalog number: UFC3LCCNB-HMT)

12. Falcon 15 mL centrifuge tubes (Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 352097)

13. Falcon 50 mL centrifuge tubes (Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 352098)

14. Pierce^TM centrifuge columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 89868)

15. Pierce^TM C18 spin tips, 96 tips (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 84850)

16. Certified kits, screw thread vials, 12 × 32 mm, 9 mm thread, unassembled (Merck, catalog number: 29385-U)

17. pH strips (Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 10642751)

18. Pierce^TM BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific, catalog number: 23225)

19. Anaerobic indicator strips (Fisher Scientific, catalog number: BR0055B)

Equipment

1. Calibrated pH meter

2. Benchtop centrifuge

3. Chromatography column (Bio-Rad, model: Econo-Column^®)

4. Shaker (IKA, model: VX 2E.n)

5. Orbital rotator

6. Tube rotator (Camlab, catalog number: 51901-26)

7. Ultrasonic USC-TH sonicator bath

8. Hypoxia chamber (Don Whitley Scientific)

9. Racks (Thermo Fischer)

10. Freezer (-20 °C and -80 °C)

11. Refrigerator (2–8 °C)

12. LC-Mass Spectrometer

13. Trans-Blot Turbo system (Bio-Rad)

14. Buffer tank and lid (Bio-Rad)

15. Gel holder cassette (Bio-Rad)

16. OxyLite probe (Oxford Optronix)

Software and datasets

High-resolution mass spectrometry generates large datasets that require computational processing to identify peptide sequences from fragmentation spectra. Common search algorithms, including MASCOT, SEQUEST, MaxQuant, and Protein Pilot, perform this task by searching spectra against fragmentation spectra databases and de novo peptide sequencing. In immunopeptidomics, where MHC-bound peptides are not produced by enzymatic digestion and therefore do not follow trypsin-specific cleavage rules [cleavage after arginine (R) and lysine (K)], hybrid approaches are strongly recommended. Computational tools like PEAKS combine database searching with de novo sequencing, first generating candidate peptide sequences through de novo analysis to guide the database search. This strategy enhances both search efficiency and identification accuracy, which is critical given the non-tryptic nature of MHC-associated peptides. In this protocol, we used PEAKS Studio v10.0 (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc.), as its integration of de novo sequencing with database searching provides improved identification of non-tryptic peptides compared to conventional search engines focused on tryptic peptides.

Note: PEAKS (commercial license required; https://www.bioinfor.com/peaks/), NetMHC (freely available; https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetMHCpan-4.1/), IEDB (freely available; https://www.iedb.org/), WebLogo (freely available; http://weblogo.threeplusone.com/), FragPipe (freely available; https://fragpipe.nesvilab.org/), and MHCquant 2 (freely available; https://www.mhquant.org/) are commonly used in these analyses.

Procedure

A. Generation of cell lysates

Note: The amount of starting material required depends on the LC-MS/MS platform used, the desired analytical depth, and the level of HLA expression in the cell sample. For instance, cancer cell lines cultured in vitro are among the simplest sample types for MHC-peptide isolation, typically requiring between 5 × 10⁷ and 1 × 10⁹ cells per preparation.

1. Culture cells in the appropriate media at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO₂, until approximately 80% confluency is reached.

2. For hypoxic samples:

a. Incubate the cells at the required level of oxygen for the desired time before harvesting. Perform all harvesting steps inside the hypoxic chamber to prevent reoxygenation.

b. Pre-equilibrate PBS and collection tubes in the hypoxia chamber overnight to minimize oxygen exposure.

c. Remove the culture medium and wash cells twice with PBS.

d. Detach adherent cells using a cell scraper in PBS.

e. Transfer the suspension to 15 or 50 mL conical tubes and centrifuge at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C. Return tubes to the chamber to discard the supernatant.

f. Resuspend the pellet with PBS and centrifuge.

g. Carefully remove and discard the supernatant.

h. Use pelleted cells directly for HLA-I profiling or snap freeze in liquid nitrogen for future use.

Note: Subsequent steps of the protocol can be performed outside the hypoxia chamber.

Critical: When conducting experiments under very low oxygen conditions, use glass dishes instead of plastic ones, as glass helps minimize oxygen retention that could affect the results. Ensure that hypoxic incubation is performed in a hypoxia chamber rather than a standard incubator set to low oxygen. Using a dedicated hypoxia chamber maintains stable low-oxygen conditions throughout incubation and prevents reoxygenation artifacts. The absence of traces of oxygen can be periodically verified by using anaerobic indicator strips. To further verify oxygen levels, an OxyLite probe can be used to determine oxygen levels in the media surrounding cells exposed to hypoxia.

Critical: For hypoxia-treated samples, it is essential to confirm that cells were indeed hypoxic at the time of harvest. Include an additional dish cultured and collected in parallel and validate hypoxia by measuring HIF-1α protein levels using western blot analysis. For experiments performed under more severe hypoxic conditions (<0.1% O₂), activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) can be confirmed by assessing increased GRP78 expression, which serves as an additional marker of cellular adaptation to low oxygen [21]. A representative western blot illustrating typical results is provided in Figure 1A.

Figure 1. Overview of immunopeptidomics data analysis for HCT116 cells exposed to normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. (A) Representative western blot of HT29 cells exposed to hypoxic conditions (<0.1% O₂) for the indicated time points. (B) Total number of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I peptides presented on HCT116 cells in normoxia and hypoxia (<0.1% O₂). (C) Unique number of MHC I peptides in normoxia vs. hypoxia after 24 h. (D) Allele binding distribution of MHC I peptides. (E) Length frequency distribution of MHC I peptides. (F) Seqlogo comparison of MHC binding motifs in normoxia and hypoxia for three different MHC I subtypes. Peptides were assessed using NetMHCPan 4.1. Data represent mean ± SEM from three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired Student’s t-test.

3. For normoxic samples:

a. Transfer the cell suspension to 15 or 50 mL conical tubes and pellet cells by centrifugation at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C.

b. Carefully remove and discard the supernatant.

c. Resuspend cells and wash twice in cold PBS.

d. Carefully remove and discard the supernatant.

e. Use pelleted cells directly for HLA-I profiling or snap freeze in liquid nitrogen for future use.

f. Dry cell pellets can be stored at -80 °C up to 6 months.

B. Preparation of cross-linked beads

Note: Refer to Figure 2 for a schematic overview of the different steps.

1. Wash the column to remove polymerics and other contaminants: Incubate the column with 10% acetic acid for at least 30 min. Thoroughly wash with PBS and verify that the pH is neutral before proceeding.

2. Prepare protein A Sepharose beads: Resuspend the beads gently by slow inversion or rolling; avoid vigorous shaking. Transfer the required volume of protein A Sepharose [supplied as a 50% (w/v) slurry in 20% (v/v) ethanol] into a 50 mL conical tube. Fill the tube with PBS, then centrifuge at 100× g for 1 min to pellet the beads. Carefully discard the ethanol-containing supernatant.

Critical: Do not pipette up and down when resuspending, as this can damage the beads. The volume of protein A Sepharose beads utilized is proportional to the quantity of antibody required for each experiment; in general, 50 μL of dry beads is used per 1 mg of antibody.

3. Antibody coupling: Prepare the MHC I monoclonal antibody (clone W6/32) at a concentration of 0.5–1 mg/mL in PBS. Add the antibody to the washed protein A Sepharose and incubate for 30 min on an orbital rotator at ~11 rpm at room temperature (RT). Alternatively, incubate for 1–4 h (minimum 1 h) on an orbital rotator at 4 °C.

Critical: Before cross-linking, confirm the quality and specificity of the antibody batch by assessing its binding properties using flow cytometry.

4. Remove residual free amines: Transfer the antibody-bound resin back into the column. Wash the resin with 10 column volumes (CV) of borate wash buffer, allowing the buffer to drain fully.

Critical: Removing residual primary amines is essential, as they can react with the cross-linker and reduce efficiency. Do not let the column dry during this step.

5. Cross-link the antibody: Add 10 CV of freshly prepared DMP cross-linking solution to the column at RT and allow it to drain until the meniscus is just above the resin bed. Seal the bottom of the column and incubate for 30 min at RT.

6. Terminate cross-linking: Wash the beads with 10 CV of ice-cold 0.2 M Tris, pH 8.0, to quench the cross-linking reaction.

7. Neutralize and wash: Wash the beads with 10 CV of the termination buffer, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0. Confirm that the pH of the resin is neutral before storing or using it further.

8. Recover the immuno-resin: Using a stripette (10 mL), gently resuspend the beads and transfer them into a clean container with an appropriate volume of 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0.

Pause point: At this stage, the cross-linked immuno-resin can be stored at 4 °C for up to 1 month.

Figure 2. Generation of MHC immunoaffinity column. The first six steps of the procedure are shown. CV, column volume; DMP, dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride.

C. Generation of cell lysate and MHC immunoaffinity purification

Note: Refer to Figure 3 for a schematic showing the different steps.

1. Thaw samples on ice to minimize cell lysis-induced DNA release.

2. Add approximately 0.5 mL of 2× ice-cold lysis buffer to each sample. Mix gently by slow pipetting using low-retention tips until the lysate is homogeneous. Adjust the volume with additional lysis buffer if needed to ensure complete resuspension.

3. Incubate the lysate on an orbital rotator at 4 °C for 30 min to solubilize MHC complexes.

Note: Do not exceed 30 min to preserve complex integrity.

4. Remove nuclei: Centrifuge the lysate at 500× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Carefully collect the supernatant and transfer it into a fresh tube. Freeze the nuclei pellet at -80 °C for potential genomic DNA extraction and downstream WGS analysis.

5. Clarify the lysate: Transfer the supernatant into a pre-chilled and pre-labeled 2 mL LoBind Eppendorf tube. Centrifuge at 20,000× g for 45 min at 4 °C to remove insoluble debris.

Optional: Perform a BCA protein assay to quantify total protein content. Normalize all samples to the lowest measured protein concentration by adding an appropriate volume of 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, to adjust the final lysis buffer concentration to 1×.

6. Prepare the immunoaffinity resin: Aliquot the required volume of cross-linked immuno-resin into 2 mL LoBind Eppendorf tubes.

7. Immunoprecipitation: Add the clarified lysate to the cross-linked beads (recommended ratio: 0.5–2 mL lysate per 20 μL dry beads). Incubate overnight (12–16 h) at 4 °C on an orbital rotator or tube rotator at ~10–15 rpm to ensure gentle mixing and efficient capture of MHC complexes. Use a minimum lysate volume of 0.5 mL to fully suspend the resin; for volumes exceeding 2 mL, divide the lysate across multiple tubes to maintain optimal bead-lysate contact.

Figure 3. Main steps of the procedure: Generation of cell lysate, immunopurification, and elution of MHC–peptide complexes

D. Removal of residual contaminants and elution of MHC-peptide complexes

Critical: For optimal performance, prepare the wash buffers immediately before use. Maintain all buffers and reagents cold during the procedure.

1. Prepare the columns: Incubate the columns with 10% acetic acid for 30 min to remove residual contaminants. Wash thoroughly with PBS.

Caution: Verify that the pH is neutral using pH test strips (0–14) before loading samples.

2. Load the lysate: Transfer the clarified lysate onto the columns containing the immuno-resin. Collect the flowthrough in pre-labeled Eppendorf tubes and store at -80 °C for downstream analyses, including MHC II-peptide complex immunoprecipitation.

3. Wash the beads: Sequentially wash the resin with at least 10 CVs of the following buffers:

a. Wash buffer 1: Low-salt chelating buffer; removes residual detergents and weakly bound contaminants; EDTA chelates divalent cations to reduce nonspecific binding.

b. Wash buffer 2: Low-salt buffer; removes residual detergents and nonspecifically interacting proteins.

c. Wash buffer 3: High-salt buffer; removes strongly nonspecifically bound proteins due to increased ionic strength.

d. Wash buffer 4: Very low-salt buffer; final wash to remove excess salt and prevent crystal formation before elution.

Caution: Do not allow the immune resin to dry.

4. Elute the MHC-peptide complexes: Add 5 CVs of 10% acetic acid to the column. Collect the eluate into LoBind 2 mL Eppendorf tubes. Use a syringe plunger to gently push out any remaining liquid to maximize recovery.

5. Proceed to peptide separation: Continue with the separation of peptides from the MHC-peptide complexes.

E. Separation of peptides from MHC-peptide complexes

1. Pre-condition filter units: For each sample, fill an ultra-free MC-PLHCC centrifugal filter unit with 500 μL of 10% acetic acid.

2. Centrifuge at 15,000× g for 45–60 min at 4 °C to remove residual contaminants.

3. Remove the filter from the collection tube, discard the flowthrough, and rinse the bottom of the filter by gently pipetting up and down with 500 μL of 10% acetic acid to ensure complete removal of residual liquid.

4. Return the filter insert to the clean collection tube.

5. Load samples: Add the MHC I complex eluates to the pre-conditioned, pre-labeled filter units.

6. Centrifuge at 15,000× g for ~1 h at 4 °C (for a ~500 μL sample volume).

Note: If the sample volume exceeds the filter capacity, spin in multiple batches; keep remaining sample aliquots on ice between spins. Collect the filtrate in pre-labeled low-binding Eppendorf tubes.

7. Transfer the collected filtrates to fresh, pre-labeled Eppendorf tubes.

8. Peptide recovery wash: Add 50 μL of 20% ACN 0.1% TFA directly onto the filter membrane.

Critical: The peptide recovery wash with 20% ACN 0.1% TFA is required to ensure complete recovery of peptides remaining on the filter membrane. Always combine this wash with the main filtrate for downstream LC-MS/MS analysis to maximize peptide yield, especially for low-abundance MHC-bound peptides.

9. Centrifuge again at 15,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C to recover any residual peptides.

Optional: Spike-in control for peptide recovery: To monitor recovery of low-abundance peptides, add a defined amount of a synthetic or isotopically labeled spike-in peptide to the cell lysate before immunoaffinity purification. Analyze the spike-in peptide alongside endogenous peptides during LC-MS/MS. This enables users to assess recovery efficiency and identify potential issues throughout the workflow.

10. Pool the eluate with the main filtrate collected in step E6.

11. Dry the combined peptide eluates using a Speed-Vac concentrator.

Pause point: Dried peptides can be stored at -20 °C until further LC-MS analysis.

F. Desalting with Pierce^TM C18 spin tips

Critical: For best results, prepare reagents freshly before use. Discard unused reagents after one week of storage.

1. Sample resuspension: Reconstitute dried peptide samples in 50 μL of 1% ACN 0.1% TFA. Confirm that the solution pH is <4 using pH test strips.

Critical: Avoid pipetting up and down to minimize peptide loss and prevent bubble formation. Do not vortex, as this can cause foaming and reduce recovery of low-abundance peptides.

2. Place tubes on an orbital shaker and mix at 1,000× g for 10–15 min (IKA VX 2E.n).

3. Sonicate samples for 3–5 min in a water bath sonicator without temperature control.

4. Clarify the resuspended samples by centrifugation at 20,000× g (maximum speed) for 10 min at 4 °C.

5. Insert the Pierce^TM C18 spin tip into the spin adapter seated inside a clean 2 mL microcentrifuge tube.

6. Tip conditioning: Add 20 μL of 80% ACN 0.1% TFA to the spin tip. Centrifuge at 1,000× g for 1 min to wet the C18 resin.

7. Equilibration: Add 20 μL of 0.1% TFA to the tip and centrifuge at 1,000× g for 1 min. Repeat this equilibration step once more.

8. Discard the collection tubes containing the flowthrough.

9. Sample loading: Carefully apply 20–50 μL of clarified peptide solution onto the equilibrated spin tip, using the original sample Eppendorf tube as the collection vessel. Centrifuge at 1,000× g for 1 min.

Critical: Confirm visually that the entire sample has passed through the tip. For larger volumes or slower flow rates, extend centrifugation time to 2–3 min, if necessary, but do not increase the centrifuge speed.

10. Add 20 μL of 0.1% TFA to the tip and centrifuge at 1,000× g for 1 min. Repeat this wash once more to remove residual contaminants.

11. Transfer the spin tip and adapter to a new, pre-labeled Eppendorf tube. Discard the previous collection tube.

12. Add 20 μL of 50% ACN 0.1% TFA to the tip. Centrifuge at 1,000× g for 1 min to elute peptides. Repeat this elution step once more to maximize peptide recovery.

13. Dry the pooled eluates in a Speed-Vac concentrator.

Critical: Avoid drying completely to prevent loss of hydrophilic peptides by adsorption to the tube walls.

14. Proceed immediately with LC-MS/MS sample preparation, or store partially dried samples at -80 °C until analysis.

G. Preparation of samples for LC-MS/MS

1. Sample resuspension: Add 15–25 μL of 0.1% formic acid to each dried peptide sample to fully resuspend the peptides.

2. Place the tubes in a sonicating water bath for 5 min to help release peptides.

Critical: Ensure complete resuspension of peptides to avoid sample loss.

3. Centrifuge the samples at 13,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C to pellet any insoluble particulates. Carefully transfer the clear supernatant into clean autosampler vials, avoiding bubble formation to ensure the sample settles at the bottom.

Critical: Failure to remove particulates can clog the downstream nano-LC system. Use low-bind vials to prevent peptide adhesion.

4. Injection and analysis: Load the prepared samples onto the mass spectrometer and run using an optimized LC gradient. Suggested settings for Thermo Fisher Q-Exactive-HF are detailed in Table 2.

Critical: Data acquisition parameters, such as inclusion of singly charged peptides, number of ions selected per cycle, and accumulation time, should be carefully optimized to ensure the collection of high-quality, information-rich MS/MS spectra.

Use high-mass-accuracy analyzers (e.g., Orbitrap or TOF instruments) instead of lower-accuracy systems like ion traps to increase confidence in peptide identifications, particularly when combining de novo sequencing with database searching. Optimize acquisition parameters by setting high ion targets and longer accumulation times (e.g., 100–120 ms) to enhance MS/MS spectral quality and increase spectral yield (up to ~30%–40%). On Orbitrap systems, a high ion target prevents limiting the maximum injection time. Including singly charged precursors can further boost identifications, especially for alleles producing peptides with few basic residues, but these should be fragmented at higher collision energy and lower priority to reduce co-isolation of contaminants.

Table 2. Instrument-specific settings for the Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer

Data analysis

1. Database search: Analyze the raw MS/MS data using your preferred search engine and protein database. In the workflow presented here, PEAKS Studio v10.0 was used with parameters optimized for the identification of MHC class-I peptides. Searches were performed with no enzyme specificity and restricted to 8–12 amino acid-long peptides, reflecting typical MHC I ligands. Mass tolerances were set to 10 ppm for precursor ions and 0.02 Da for fragment ions. Variable modifications included oxidation (M), deamidation (N/Q), phosphorylation (S/T/Y), and cysteinylation (C). Peptide identifications were filtered to a 1% FDR (false discovery rate) at the peptide level, and searches were conducted against the UniProt human reference proteome supplemented with common contaminants (Figure 1B, C).

Note: Most search engines are protein-centric and may penalize proteins represented by only a single peptide; this is a common feature in immunopeptidomic datasets, where many MHC I peptides appear as singletons [22].

2. Curation and motif analysis: Inspect the list of identified peptides. Evaluate peptide lengths, motifs, and predicted MHC binding to confirm data quality. Tools such as the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB; http://www.iedb.org/) and NetMHC 4.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetMHC-4.1/) can be used to predict binding affinity and assign peptides to their respective HLA alleles [23] (Figure 1D).

3. (Optional) Length distribution: Plot the distribution of peptide lengths (typically 8–12 mers for MHC class I) as a histogram or frequency plot to assess whether the observed peptide repertoire matches expected MHC binding characteristics (Figure 1E).

4. Contaminant removal: Filter out known contaminant peptides, including proteolytic fragments, carryover peptides from pre-columns, buffers, or other laboratory sources to ensure reliable peptide identifications and biological interpretations. Build and maintain a curated list of experimentally identified contaminants from multiple negative controls across MS runs to support this step.

5. Reference comparison using the HLA Ligand Atlas: Cross-reference the identified peptide repertoire against the HLA Ligand Atlas, a large-scale reference database of naturally presented HLA ligands across multiple benign human tissues (PXD019643). This comparison helps annotate peptides as previously observed in non-malignant contexts, deprioritize broadly presented peptides that may represent background or self-antigens, and highlight candidate tumor-enriched ligands. The Atlas can also be used for comparative motif analysis and, when appropriate, for building spectral libraries to support DIA-based workflows.

6. Visualization: Generate sequence logos to illustrate conserved motifs within the identified peptides. This can be done using online tools such as WebLogo 3 (http://weblogo.threeplusone.com) [24] or Seq2Logo (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/Seq2Logo-2.0/) [25].

7. Clustering analysis: Use unsupervised clustering algorithms, such as the Gibbs clustering method [26] or other clustering tools [27], to group peptides sharing similar binding motifs. Clustering can help refine allele assignments and assist in identifying and removing nonspecifically bound or contaminant peptides (Figure 1F).

Validation of protocol

This protocol has been used and validated in the following research article:

• Estephan et al. [28]. Hypoxia promotes tumor immune evasion by suppressing MHC-I expression and antigen presentation. EMBO Journal (Figures 5B–E and 6 and Supplementary Figures 6, 7, and 9).

General notes and troubleshooting

Troubleshooting

Problem 1: Low yield of MHC I-peptide complexes.

Possible causes: Antibody poor binding or failed cross-link, insufficient protein solubilization during lysis.

Solutions: Check each batch of antibody by flow cytometry to ensure binding affinity and ensure cross-linking was effective. Confirm that all buffers are at the correct pH and were properly prepared. Optimize detergent type and concentration in lysis buffer and conditions for different cell types.

Problem 2: Peptide loss during concentration, resulting in low identification.

Possible issue: Sample lost during concentration.

Solution: Ensure that samples are not completely dried during centrifugal evaporation and that they are resuspended carefully. This avoids loss of material due to binding to the tube surface.

Problem 3: Low number of peptides identified.

Possible issue: The mass spectrometer is not performing optimally.

Solutions: Ensure that the mass spectrometer is functioning according to specifications by regularly tuning the instrument and running quality-control samples. In our laboratory, we use HeLa digested with Elastase as a QC standard to monitor instrument performance. Elastase is preferred over trypsin because it cleaves at more sites, providing a better proxy for immunopeptidomics workflows. For each instrument and method, we establish a benchmark. Deviations from these benchmarks indicate potential performance issues.

Acknowledgments

H.E.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing-Original draft, Writing-Review & Editing. E.M.H.: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing-Review & Editing. E.A.: Writing-Review & Editing. This work was supported by Medical Research Council‐UKRI grant MC_UU_00001/8, Cancer Research UK RadNet Centre Award C6078/A28736, NCI R01 CA255334, R01 CA262388, NIH grants P01CA275738/P01CA257804, and EPSRC EP/S019901/1. This protocol was used in [28]. The protocol was modified and adapted from [13]. The following figures were created using BioRender: Graphical overview, BioRender.com/BM28VRHAEH; Figure 2, BioRender.com/CN28VRHTLV; Figure 3, BioRender.com/AY28VRI5PW.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1. Neefjes, J., Jongsma, M. L. M., Paul, P. and Bakke, O. (2011). Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation. Nat Rev Immunol. 11(12): 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3084
2. Yewdell, J. W. (2022). MHC Class I Immunopeptidome: Past, Present, and Future. Mol Cell Proteomics. 21(7): 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100230
3. Yewdell, J. W., Reits, E. and Neefjes, J. (2003). Making sense of mass destruction: quantitating MHC class I antigen presentation. Nat Rev Immunol. 3(12): 952–961. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1250
4. Dersh, D., Hollý, J. and Yewdell, J. W. (2021). A few good peptides: MHC class I-based cancer immunosurveillance and immunoevasion. Nat Rev Immunol. 21(2): 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0390-6
5. Kubiniok, P., Marcu, A., Bichmann, L., Kuchenbecker, L., Schuster, H., Hamelin, D. J., Duquette, J. D., Kovalchik, K. A., Wessling, L., Kohlbacher, O., et al. (2022). Understanding the constitutive presentation of MHC class I immunopeptidomes in primary tissues. iScience. 25(2): 103768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103768
6. Garrido, F., Aptsiauri, N., Doorduijn, E. M., Garcia Lora, A. M. and van Hall, T. (2016). The urgent need to recover MHC class I in cancers for effective immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol. 39: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2015.12.007
7. Bassani-Sternberg, M. and Gfeller, D. (2016). Unsupervised HLA Peptidome Deconvolution Improves Ligand Prediction Accuracy and Predicts Cooperative Effects in Peptide–HLA Interactions. J Immunol. 197(6): 2492–2499. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1600808
8. Bruno, P. M., Timms, R. T., Abdelfattah, N. S., Leng, Y., Lelis, F. J. N., Wesemann, D. R., Yu, X. G. and Elledge, S. J. (2023). High-throughput, targeted MHC class I immunopeptidomics using a functional genetics screening platform. Nat Biotechnol. 41(7): 980–992. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01566-x
9. Mahoney, K. E., Reser, L., Ruiz Cuevas, M. V., Abelin, J. G., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F. and Malaker, S. A. (2025). Identification of Post-translationally Modified MHC Class I–Associated Peptides as Potential Cancer Immunotherapeutic Targets. Mol Cell Proteomics. 24(8): 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100971
10. Yadav, M., Jhunjhunwala, S., Phung, Q. T., Lupardus, P., Tanguay, J., Bumbaca, S., Franci, C., Cheung, T. K., Fritsche, J., Weinschenk, T., et al. (2014). Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing. Nature. 515(7528): 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14001
11. Abelin, J. G., Keskin, D. B., Sarkizova, S., Hartigan, C. R., Zhang, W., Sidney, J., Stevens, J., Lane, W., Zhang, G. L., Eisenhaure, T. M., et al. (2017). Mass Spectrometry Profiling of HLA-Associated Peptidomes in Mono-allelic Cells Enables More Accurate Epitope Prediction. Immunity. 46(2): 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.007
12. Caron, E., Kowalewski, D., Chiek Koh, C., Sturm, T., Schuster, H. and Aebersold, R. (2015). Analysis of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Immunopeptidomes Using Mass Spectrometry*. Mol Cell Proteomics. 14(12): 3105–3117. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O115.052431
13. Purcell, A. W., Ramarathinam, S. H. and Ternette, N. (2019). Mass spectrometry–based identification of MHC-bound peptides for immunopeptidomics. Nat Protoc. 14(6): 1687–1707. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0133-y
14. Schuster, H., Peper, J. K., Bösmüller, H. C., Röhle, K., Backert, L., Bilich, T., Ney, B., Löffler, M. W., Kowalewski, D. J., Trautwein, N., et al. (2017). The immunopeptidomic landscape of ovarian carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 114(46): e1707658114. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707658114
15. Marcu, A., Bichmann, L., Kuchenbecker, L., Kowalewski, D. J., Freudenmann, L. K., Backert, L., Mühlenbruch, L., Szolek, A., Lübke, M., Wagner, P., et al. (2021). HLA Ligand Atlas: a benign reference of HLA-presented peptides to improve T-cell-based cancer immunotherapy. J ImmunoTher Cancer. 9(4): e002071. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002071
16. Chen, Z., Han, F., Du, Y., Shi, H. and Zhou, W. (2023). Hypoxic microenvironment in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. 8(1): 70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01332-8
17. Zhuang, Y., Liu, K., He, Q., Gu, X., Jiang, C. and Wu, J. (2023). Hypoxia signaling in cancer: Implications for therapeutic interventions. MedComm. 4(1): e203. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.203
18. McGranahan, N. and Swanton, C. (2019). Neoantigen quality, not quantity. Sci Transl Med. 11(506): eaax7918. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aax7918
19. Ott, P. A., Hu, Z., Keskin, D. B., Shukla, S. A., Sun, J., Bozym, D. J., Zhang, W., Luoma, A., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Peter, L., et al. (2017). An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma. Nature. 547(7662): 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22991
20. Restifo, N. P., Dudley, M. E. and Rosenberg, S. A. (2012). Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol. 12(4): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3191
21. Wouters, B. G. and Koritzinsky, M. (2008). Hypoxia signalling through mTOR and the unfolded protein response in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 8(11): 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2501
22. Faridi, P., Purcell, A. W. and Croft, N. P. (2018). In Immunopeptidomics We Need a Sniper Instead of a Shotgun. Proteomics. 18(12): e201700464. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700464
23. Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., Worning, P., Lauemøller, S. L., Lamberth, K., Buus, S., Brunak, S. and Lund, O. (2003). Reliable prediction of T‐cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Sci. 12(5): 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.0239403
24. Schneider, T. D. and Stephens, R. (1990). Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 18(20): 6097–6100. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.20.6097
25. Thomsen, M. C. F. and Nielsen, M. (2012). Seq2Logo: a method for construction and visualization of amino acid binding motifs and sequence profiles including sequence weighting, pseudo counts and two-sided representation of amino acid enrichment and depletion. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: W281–W287. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks469
26. Andreatta, M., Lund, O. and Nielsen, M. (2012). Simultaneous alignment and clustering of peptide data using a Gibbs sampling approach. Bioinformatics. 29(1): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts621
27. Bassani-Sternberg, M., Chong, C., Guillaume, P., Solleder, M., Pak, H., Gannon, P. O., Kandalaft, L. E., Coukos, G. and Gfeller, D. (2017). Deciphering HLA-I motifs across HLA peptidomes improves neo-antigen predictions and identifies allostery regulating HLA specificity. PLoS Comput Biol. 13(8): e1005725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005725
28. Estephan, H., Tailor, A., Parker, R., Kreamer, M., Papandreou, I., Campo, L., Easton, A., Moon, E. J., Denko, N. C., Ternette, N., et al. (2025). Hypoxia promotes tumor immune evasion by suppressing MHC-I expression and antigen presentation. EMBO J. 44(3): 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44318-024-00319-7