Published: Vol 9, Iss 22, Nov 20, 2019 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3435 Views: 3636
Reviewed by: Alexandros AlexandratosTzvetina BrumbarovaAbhijit Kale
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Dual-Color Live Imaging of Adult Muscle Stem Cells in the Embryonic Tissues of Drosophila melanogaster
Monika Zmojdzian [...] Rajaguru Aradhya
Feb 5, 2023 1012 Views
Live Imaging of Phagoptosis in ex vivo Drosophila Testis
Diana Kanaan [...] Hila Toledano
Mar 20, 2023 1182 Views
Protocol for Imaging the Same Class IV Neurons at Different Stages of Development
Sonal Shree and Jonathon Howard
Aug 20, 2024 800 Views
Abstract
Regulation of gene expression involves dynamic changes in chromatin organization, where in many cases open chromatin structure correlates with gene activation. Several methods enable monitoring changes in chromatin accessibility, including ATAC-seq, FAIRE-seq, MNase-seq and DNAse-seq methods, which involve Next-generation-sequencing (NGS). Focusing on the adult Drosophila differentiated gut enterocytes (ECs) we used a sequencing-free method that enables visualizing and semi-quantifying large-scale changes in chromatin structure using in vitro methylation assay with the bacterial CpG Methyltransferase, M. Sssl, that determine chromatin accessibility. In brief, as CpG methylation is minimal in differentiated somatic Drosophila cells, we used the bacterial M. SssI enzyme to methylate CpG dinucleotides in situ depending on their chromatin accessibility. The methylated dinucleotides are detected using 5mCytosine monoclonal antibody and nuclei are visualized microscopically. Thus, the 5mC method enables to monitor large-scale chromatin changes in heterogenic cellular tissue focusing on the cell type of interest and without the need for cell purification or NGS.
Keywords: Chromatin 5-methyl-Cytosine (5mC)Background
The regulation of the differentiated state of cells requires active supervision and is established and maintained by “identity supervisors” (Natoli, 2010; Holmberg and Perlmann, 2012). In part, these supervisors are transcription factors (TFs) that together with chromatin and architectural/scaffold proteins establish and maintain large-scale organization of the differentiated nucleus (Bitman-Lotan and Orian, 2018). In both mammals and Drosophila, the adult gut is a highly dynamic tissue where intestinal stem cells (ISCs) proliferate to self-renew or differentiate to give rise to mature differentiated gut polyploid enterocytes (ECs) (Jiang and Edgar, 2012; Buchon et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2016). In the differentiated ECs, the transcription factor Hey together with the Drosophila type A lamin, Lamin-C, co-regulate enhancers activity and large-scale nuclear organization that prevents the expression of progenitor and non-relevant programs (Flint-Brodsly et al., 2019). Genetic ablation of Hey in young ECs, or due to its decline during aging lead to a failure to express EC programs, including a decrease in LamC protein. Loss of LamC resulted in the ectopic expression of non-relevant gene programs and re-organization of the nucleus. These large-scale changes in chromatin organization can be visualized using the 5mC method as shown in Figures 1A and 1B. Moreover, the 5mC method was also used to monitor changes in chromatin accessibility in other Drosophila tissues such as the ovary upon loss of upSETR, a chromatin regulator (Rincon-Arano et al., 2012). Please note that while the method provides a qualitative approach to address chromatin organization in complex tissues, NGS-based approaches should be considered to confirm and fine map structural changes.
Figure 1. Loss of Hey in ECs results in increased chromatin accessibility in polyploid cells.Confocal images of midguts expressing the indicated transgenes: A. Control midgut stained for 5mC without M. SssL-I enzyme. B. Control midgut with enzyme treatment. C. Midguts where Hey was knockdown in ECs. 5mC methylation is shown in red, DAPI marks DNA, scale bar = 10 μM, dashed squares point to cells shown in the inset. D. Quantification of 5mC positive polyploid cells in similar setting to B and C. ** = P<0.01 (adopted from Flint-Brodsly et al., 2019).
General description of the method: The M. SssI methyltransferase modifies all cytosine residues (C5) within the double-stranded dinucleotide recognition sequence CG, and it has been used for nucleosome mapping from isolated nuclei, during transcription (Fatemi et al., 2005; Bell et al., 2010). As the Drosophila genome has only minimal endogenous 5-cytosine methylation (5mC), we established conditions that enable efficient modification of mCpG dinucleotides by M. SssI methyltransferase depending on chromatin accessibility in Drosophila guts in situ. After a mild fixation and efficient permeabilization of the guts, M. SssI-based CpG methylation is performed at different time points and the DNA is denatured to expose the modified DNA. The resulting methylation is observed using a 5m Cytosine specific monoclonal antibody (Bell et al., 2010), and is low or absent in untreated ECs in wild-type tissues (Not shown). M. SssI-based 5mC methylation is only minimally observed in wildtype polyploid ECs (Figure 1A). However, it dramatically increases in polyploid cells resembling ECs upon loss of Hey (Figures 1B and 1C; Flint-Brodsly et al., 2019). Quantification of the visual signal demonstrated that the 5mC signal was observed in 11% of control ECs, and in 24% of Hey-targeted ECs (Figure 1C, n = 395, 820 respectively, P< 0.01).
The 5mC method described below (Outlines in Figure 2) is simple to use, reproducible, enables focusing on specific cells of interest and can be combined with linage-tracing methods such as G-TRACE (Evans et al., 2009).
Moreover, it does not involve cell purification or NGS, and is semi-quantitative. However, it requires the appropriate controls, including scaling the duration of the methylation reaction, fixation, permeabilization conditions and enzyme adjustments depending on the tissue of choice. Additional semi-quantitative evaluation can be performed by extracting the DNA from treated tissues and using nuclei acid-specific ELISA or DNA-based dot blot to estimate the dynamic range of the 5mC methylation. Moreover, unlike NGS-based methods (Tsompana and Buck, 2014), it does not point to the genomic location of the accessible regions.
Figure 2. 5mC method flow chart
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Recipes
Prepare each solution fresh and keep no longer than a week at 4 °C or on Ice.
Acknowledgments
This original protocol was used in Rincon-Arano et al. (2012). The research was supported by Israel Science Foundation (ISF) (Grant 739/15), and the Rappaport Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences and Flinkman-Marandi cancer research grant to AO.
Competing interests
We declare that there is no financial or non-financial conflict of interest, or competing interests related to this work to any of the authors.
References
Article Information
Copyright
Bitman-Lotan et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
How to cite
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:
Category
Molecular Biology > DNA > Chromatin accessibility
Cell Biology > Cell imaging > Confocal microscopy
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link