Advanced Search
2.6. In Vitro Antidiabetic Activity (α-Amylase Inhibition Assay)
Last updated date: Oct 5, 2026 Views: 26 Forks: 0
α-Amylase Inhibition Assay (Starch-Iodine Method)
Mohammed Abu Tayab1’ *
1 Department of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Chittagong, Chattogram 4318, Bangladesh
Corresponding author: abutayab.me@gmail.com
Abstract
α-amylase inhibition assay is an in vitro test for determining the potential antidiabetic activity of plant extracts and other substances, using acarbose as a standard inhibitor. The assay, known as the starch-iodine method, measures the remaining starch after incubation with α-amylase, where iodine forms a colored complex with starch, and absorbance is measured at 620 nm. Percentage inhibition of α-amylase activity is calculated relative to an enzyme control without inhibitor. Dose-response data can be constructed to estimate the IC50 by regression analysis.
1. Background
In type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), persistent hyperglycemia is indicated by two metrics: fasting and postprandial blood glucose concentrations (Dong et al., 2012). Elevated postprandial blood glucose levels are thought to have a significant role in the development of DM2 (Dong et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2014). Controlling postprandial hyperglycemia has been considered as an essential therapeutic technique in the treatment of DM2. The strategy involves blocking carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes like α-amylase and α-glucosidase to delay glucose absorption through the intestinal epithelium (Ademiluyi and Oboh, 2013; Bhandari et al., 2008; Subramanian et al., 2008; Tundis et al., 2010). α-amylase is a 57.6 kDa calcium-dependent metalloenzyme composed of 512 amino acids arranged in a singular oligosaccharide chain (de Sales et al., 2012; Whitcomb and Lowe, 2007). Upon the binding of starch to its substrate-binding site, certain catalytic residues from its Domain A engage with starch, commencing hydrolysis into shorter oligosaccharides by severing α-1,4 glycosidic bonds (de Sales et al., 2012; Etxeberria et al., 2012). The last phase of digestion encompassed α-glucosidases that operated on oligosaccharides, breaking them down into glucose prior to absorption into the circulation (Etxeberria et al., 2012; P et al., 2011). The breakdown of this dietary carbohydrate occurs rapidly and leads to increased postprandial hyperglycemia (P et al., 2011). Acarbose, voglibose, and miglitol are often available DM2 medications of synthetic origin that manage postprandial hyperglycemia by inhibiting these enzymes (Ademiluyi and Oboh, 2013).
2. Materials and reagents
α-Amylase enzyme
Sodium phosphate buffer (0.02 M, pH 6.9) containing 0.006 M NaCl
Acarbose (standard inhibitor)
Soluble starch
Hydrochloric acid (HCl)
Iodine (I2)
Potassium iodide (KI)
Distilled water
Plant extract
Test tubes and micropipettes
3. Equipment and software
UV-visible spectrophotometer
Water bath or incubator set to 37°C
GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 for Windows, or equivalent data-analysis software
4. Reagent preparation
Sodium phosphate buffer (0.02 M, pH 6.9, containing 0.006 M NaCl): Dissolve 286 mg of Na₂HPO₄·7H₂O, 129 mg of NaH₂PO₄·H₂O, and 35 mg of NaCl in distilled water and make the final volume up to 100 mL. Confirm that the buffer pH is 6.9.
Soluble starch solution (1% w/v): Mix 1 g of soluble starch with distilled water and make the final volume up to 100 mL.
Hydrochloric acid (1 M): Add 8.33 mL of concentrated HCl (12 M) to distilled water, then make the final volume up to 100 mL. Always add acid to water.
Iodine reagent (0.005 M I₂ and 0.005 M KI): Dissolve 127 mg of I2 and 83 mg of KI in hot distilled water and make the final volume up to 100 mL.
α-Amylase solution (0.04 mg/mL): Dissolve 4 mg of α-amylase in 100 mL of the sodium phosphate buffer described above.
Test solutions: Prepare acarbose and plant-extract solutions at concentrations ranging from 125 to 1,000 µg/mL.
5. Procedure
Label tubes for the test concentrations, enzyme control, and blank.
For each test concentration, mix 500 µL of acarbose or plant-extract solution with 500 µL of α-amylase solution (0.04 mg/mL).
Incubate at 37°C for 10 minutes.
Add 500 µL of 1% soluble starch solution to each tube.
Re-incubate at 37°C for 15 minutes.
Stop the enzymatic reaction by adding 20 µL of 1 M HCl.
Cool the iodine reagent, add 100 µL of iodine reagent, and mix.
Measure absorbance at 620 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer.
6. Controls
Enzyme control: Replace the test solution with 500 µL of sodium phosphate buffer; this represents 100% enzyme activity.
Blank: Contains buffer solution only. The blank is subtracted from absorbance values.
7. Calculation
Percentage α-amylase inhibition was calculated using the formula:
% α-amylase inhibition = (Ac − As)/Ac × 100
where Ac and As denote the absorbance of the control reaction and the absorbance of the test sample, respectively.
Sample | Concentration (µg/mL) | Absorbance | % Inhibition |
Control | - |
|
|
Acarbose | 125 |
|
|
250 |
|
| |
500 |
|
| |
1000 |
|
| |
Plant extract | 125 |
|
|
250 |
|
| |
500 |
|
| |
1000 |
|
|
8. Data analysis
Perform each in vitro assay in triplicate (n = 3). Construct dose-response curves by plotting percentage α-amylase inhibition against concentration (µg/mL). Determine IC50 values by nonlinear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 for Windows or equivalent software.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable
Competing interests
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
Ademiluyi, A.O., Oboh, G., 2013. Soybean phenolic-rich extracts inhibit key-enzymes linked to type 2 diabetes (α-amylase and α-glucosidase) and hypertension (angiotensin I converting enzyme) in vitro. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology 65(3), 305-309.
Bhandari, M.R., Jong-Anurakkun, N., Hong, G., Kawabata, J., 2008. α-Glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activities of Nepalese medicinal herb Pakhanbhed (Bergenia ciliata, Haw.). Food Chemistry 106(1), 247-252.
de Sales, P.M., de Souza, P.M., Simeoni, L.A., Magalhães, P.d.O., Silveira, D., 2012. α-amylase inhibitors: A review of raw material and isolated compounds from plant source. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 15(1), 141-183.
Dong, H.Q., Li, M., Zhu, F., Liu, F.L., Huang, J.B., 2012. Inhibitory potential of trilobatin from Lithocarpus polystachyus Rehd against α-glucosidase and α-amylase linked to type 2 diabetes. Food Chemistry 130(2), 261-266.
Etxeberria, U., De La Garza, A.L., Campin, J., Martnez, J.A., Milagro, F.I., 2012. Antidiabetic effects of natural plant extracts via inhibition of carbohydrate hydrolysis enzymes with emphasis on pancreatic alpha amylase. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 16(3), 269-297.
Kim, K.T., Rioux, L.E., Turgeon, S.L., 2014. Alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase inhibition is differentially modulated by fucoidan obtained from Fucus vesiculosus and Ascophyllum nodosum. Phytochemistry 98, 27-33.
P, S., Zinjarde, S.S., Bhargava, S.Y., Kumar, A.R., 2011. Potent α-amylase inhibitory activity of Indian Ayurvedic medicinal plants. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 11.
Subramanian, R., Asmawi, M.Z., Sadikun, A., 2008. In vitro α-glucosidase and α-amylase enzyme inhibitory effects of Andrographis paniculata extract and andrographolide. Acta Biochimica Polonica 55(2), 391-398.
Tundis, R., Loizzo, M.R., Menichini, F., 2010. Natural Products as α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase Inhibitors and their Hypoglycaemic Potential in the Treatment of Diabetes: An Update. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 10(4), 315-331.
Whitcomb, D.C., Lowe, M.E., 2007. Human pancreatic digestive enzymes. Digestive diseases and sciences 52(1), 1-17.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link