Published: Vol 3, Iss 22, Nov 20, 2013 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.968 Views: 19631
Reviewed by: Anonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
A Participant-Derived Xenograft Mouse Model to Decode Autologous Mechanisms of HIV Control and Evaluate Immunotherapies
Emma Falling Iversen [...] R. Brad Jones
Apr 5, 2025 1370 Views
Analysis of Vascular Permeability by a Modified Miles Assay
Hilda Vargas-Robles [...] Michael Schnoor
Apr 5, 2025 1258 Views
PBMC-Humanized Mouse Model for Multiple Sclerosis: Studying Immune Changes and CNS Involvement
Anastasia Dagkonaki [...] Lesley Probert
May 20, 2025 2159 Views
Abstract
The procedures described below are for producing gastric aspiration pneumonitis in mice with alterations for rats and rabbits described parenthetically. We use 4 different injury vehicles delivered intratracheally to investigate the inflammatory responses to gastric aspiration:
1) Normal saline (NS) as the injury vehicle control
2) NS + HCl, pH = 1.25 (acid)
3) NS + gastric particles, pH ≈ 5.3 (part.)
4) NS + gastric particles + HCl, pH = 1.25 (acid + part.)
The volume, pH, and gastric particle concentration all affect the resulting lung injury. In mice, we generally use an injury volume of 3.6 ml/kg (rat: 1.2 ml/kg, rabbit: 2.4 ml/kg), an injury pH (for the acid-containing vehicles) of 1.25, and a gastric particulate concentration (in the particulate-containing vehicles) of 10 mg/ml (rat: 40 mg/ml). In our hands this results in a maximal, non-lethal lung injury with ≤ 10% mortality for the most injurious vehicle (i.e., acid + part.) The maximum tolerable particulate concentration needs to be determined empirically for any new strains to be used, especially in genetically-altered mice, because an altered inflammatory response may have detrimental affects on mortality.
We have extensive experience utilizing these procedures in the outbred strain, CD-1, as well as many genetically-altered inbred stains on the C57BL/6 background. Choice of strain should be carefully considered, especially in terms of strain-specific immune bias, to assure proper data interpretation. The size of the mouse should be ≥ 20 g at the time of injury. Smaller mice can be attempted, if necessary, but the surgical manipulation becomes increasingly more difficult and the surgery survival rate decreases substantially. There are no size or strain constraints for rat and rabbit models, but we generally use Long-Evans rats at 250-300 g and New Zealand White rats at ≈ 2 kg at the time of initial injury.
Materials and Reagents
Note: All salts and other chemicals are from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise noted (however, any source for such chemicals is probably okay to use).
Equipment
Procedure
Recipes
Normal saline (NS), sterile | 9.44 ml |
1 N HCl, sterile | 562 μl |
Normal saline (NS), sterile | 9 ml |
100 mg/ml gastric particles in NS | 1 ml (10 mg/ml) |
Normal saline (NS), sterile | 8.44 ml |
1 N HCl, sterile | 562 μl |
100 mg/ml gastric particles in NS | 1 ml (10 mg/ml) |
NaCl (58.44) | 8 g (137 mM) | |
Na2HPO4 (141.96) | 1.15 g (8.1 mM) | |
KCl (74.56) | 200 mg (2.7 mM) | |
KH2PO4 (136.09) | 200 mg (1.5 mM) |
NH4Cl (53.49) | 4.13 g (154 mM) | |
KHCO3 (100.1) | 500 mg (10 mM) | |
EDTA, tetrasodium salt (380.2) | 18.5 mg (0.1 mM) |
NaCl (58.44) | 8.77 g (150 mM) |
Tris base (121.14) | 1.82 g (15 mM) |
CaCl2.2H2O (147.02) | 147 mg (1 mM) |
MgCl2.6H2O (203.3) | 203 mg (1 mM) |
KH2PO4 (136.01) | 3.4 g (50 mM) |
Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (364.5) | 2 g (0.5%) | |
EDTA (372.24) | 744 mg (5 mM) | |
50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH = 6.0 | 400 ml |
Acknowledgments
The work presented here was supported by NIH grant HL048889, “Pathogenesis of Aspiration Pneumonitis” to Paul R Knight, M.D., Ph.D. and Bruce A. Davidson, Ph.D. To cite this protocol please also use the following reference: Davidson et al. (2013).
References
Mouse models
Rat models
Rabbit model
Article Information
Copyright
© 2013 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Davidson, B. A. and Alluri, R. (2013). Gastric Aspiration Models. Bio-protocol 3(22): e968. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.968.
Category
Immunology > Animal model > Mouse
Immunology > Animal model > Rabbit
Immunology > Animal model > Rat
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link