(*contributed equally to this work) Published: Vol 10, Iss 10, May 20, 2020 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3622 Views: 4372
Reviewed by: Alba BlesaShyam SolankiChangyi Zhang
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Quantification of Chromosomal Aberrations in Mammalian Cells
Inés Paniagua and Jacqueline J. L. Jacobs
Aug 20, 2023 1866 Views
Assay for Site-Specific Homologous Recombination Activity in Adherent Cells, Suspension Cells, and Tumor Tissues
Yuki Yoshino [...] Natsuko Chiba
Apr 5, 2025 1353 Views
Protocol for Quantifying γH2AX Foci in Irradiated Cells Using Immunofluorescence and Fiji Software
Lu Deng [...] Lingying Wu
Aug 20, 2025 934 Views
Abstract
In the last decade, genome editing has been the center of attention as a novel tool for mechanistic investigations and for potential clinical applications. Various genome editing tools like meganucleases, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector-based nucleases (TALEN), and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated genes (Cas), have been developed in recent years. For the optimal use as well as continued developments of these genome editing tools, the evaluation of their efficiencies and accuracies is vital. Here, we present a protocol for a reporter based on frameshift fluorescence protein which we recently developed to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of genome editing tools. In this method, a ~20 bp target sequence containing frame-shifting is inserted after the start codon of a cerulean fluorescence protein (CFP) to inactivate its fluorescence, and only a new insertion/deletion event in the target sequence will reactivate the CFP fluorescence. To increase the traceability, an internal ribosome entry site and a red fluorescence protein, mCherryFP, are placed downstream of the reporter. The percentage of CFP-positive cells resulted from in/del mediated fluorescence restoration can be quantified by fluorescence measuring devices as the readout for genome editing frequency. As a demonstration, we present the usage for CRISPR-Cas9 technique here with flow cytometer as the readout for fluorescence changes.
Keywords: Insertion-deletionBackground
Genome editing tools are very important for the investigations of biological mechanisms and prevention and/or treatment of genetic diseases (Maeder and Gersbach, 2016). In the last couple of decades, several genome editing tools have been introduced, which include the meganucleases (Epinat et al., 2003), zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) (Kim et al., 1996), transcription activator-like effector-based nucleases (TALEN) (Christian et al., 2010), and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated genes (Cas) (Jinek et al., 2012; Cong et al., 2013; Sander and Joung, 2014). In general, these tools create DNA double stranded breaks (DSB) to trigger genome editing in vivo (Maeder and Gersbach, 2016). The evaluation of the efficiencies and specificities of genome editing tool is essential for their applications and further developments. In our recent published study, we described a reporter that can generate quantitative readout for genome editing efficiency (Kumar et al., 2019). In this system, a ~20 bp target sequence is placed in a multiple cloning site (MCS) which is right after the start codon of Cerulean fluorescence protein (CFP) to generate a frame-shift of the open reading frame (ORF). This frameshifted-CFP (FsCFP) can be used as a reporter of genome editing because only when there is a successful DNA-double strand break (DSB) event on the target sequence followed with a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) to generate an in/del event to shift the reading frame to a correct order (by a chance of up to 1/3), the CFP fluorescence will be reactivated as a positive readout. To facilitate the quantification, an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and a red fluorescence protein, mCherryFP, is placed after the reporter. In principle, this reporter can be applied to any genome editing system as long as a DSB and NHEJ are expected from the editing. This approach can effectively detect low-efficiency editing in a population of cells with very low false negative or false positive. Furthermore, in this method, the positive cells can be conveniently identified and enriched for the examination or validation of the in/del event in the genome. Also, this method can be easily adapted for screening to optimize the genome-editing enzyme or the other components (such as guide-RNA) in the positive cells. Here, we used the CRISPR-Cas9 technique as a demonstration and the flow cytometry as the readout of the fluorescence events.
In this protocol, the target sequence is inserted between restriction sites of NotI and XhoI before CFP reporter together with sequence for the optimal recognition of Cas9 and a premature STOP codon to create a frame shift. The reporter region is then integrated in the nuclear genome of the target cell by the assistance of lentivirus. The target cells expressing the red fluorescence protein are then isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), before vectors containing the Cas9 and gRNA are introduced into these cells. After incubation, the ratio of the CFP over mCherryFP was measured in flow cytometry to provide quantitative measurement for the efficiency of the genome editing.
Materials and Reagents
Materials
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Acknowledgments
We thank the flow cytometry core facility at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center for providing the service. We also thank the funding resources–NIGMS/NIH, R01#GM107333; DoD (CDMRP), Idea Award, PC140622. The salary of the authors and the cost of experiments are supported in part by these funding resources. These funding bodies were not directly involved in any part of the design of study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or writing of the manuscript. This protocol was adapted from this published work (Kumar et al., 2019).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2020 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Moorthy, B. T., Kumar, A., Lotenfoe, L. X. and Zhang, F. (2020). Evaluation of the Efficiency of Genome Editing Tools by a Frameshift Fluorescence Protein Reporter. Bio-protocol 10(10): e3622. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3622.
Category
Biochemistry > Protein > Fluorescence
Cancer Biology > Genome instability & mutation > Cell biology assays
Molecular Biology > DNA > DNA damage and repair
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link