(*contributed equally to this work) Published: Vol 7, Iss 24, Dec 20, 2017 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2649 Views: 13243
Reviewed by: Alka MehraPooja AroraAnupam Jhingran

Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols

A Flow Cytometry–Based Assay to Quantify the Binding of Transmembrane Ligands to Their Cognate Receptors Using Fluorescent Virus-Like Particles
Colin M. Kim [...] Ahmad Yatim
Jul 5, 2026 362 Views

PrimeFlowTM Assay for Cell Type–Specific Co-detection of Transgene RNA and Protein in Mouse Spleens From Preclinical Studies
Sachith Gallolu Kankanamalage [...] Polina Goihberg
Jun 20, 2026 278 Views

A Streamlined and Time-Saving Approach to Generate HLA-DR15 MHC Class II Tetramers via In Vivo Biotinylation
Xue-Yao Zhao [...] Liang Chen
Jul 20, 2026 105 Views
Abstract
This protocol was developed to increase the richness of information available from in vivo T cell proliferation studies. DNA labelling techniques such as BrdU incorporation allow precise control of label administration and withdrawal, so that the division history of a population can be tracked in detail over long timeframes (days-weeks). Ki67 is expressed in the nucleus of dividing cells, and is retained for a short time (3-4 days) after division (Gossel et al., 2017); therefore acting as a molecular clock to identify cells that have recently divided. Combining these two techniques allows the integration of current and historical proliferation information from individual cells within a population. This data can subsequently be used to probe population dynamics by fitting mathematical models of proliferation (Gossel et al., 2017).
Keywords: T cellsBackground
Quantifying the dynamics of T cell death and division is a significant experimental and computational challenge, yet this information is vital to our understanding of how a healthy immune system develops and is maintained. A variety of techniques exist for in vivo analysis of T cell population dynamics, but the interpretation of data is complicated and results can be model-dependent (Asquith et al., 2002; De Boer and Perelson, 2013). Many of these assays are based on flow cytometric readouts, providing an opportunity to gain novel insights by exploiting the potential for multiparametric analysis. Combining analysis of BrdU uptake alongside Ki67 expression is particularly useful as each represents a distinct parameter of cell division. BrdU is a thymidine analogue that is incorporated into the DNA of dividing cells, and thus permanently marks cells that have divided during the labelling period (Tough and Sprent, 1994; Bonhoeffer et al., 2000). In contrast, Ki67 is a transient marker of cell division: the Ki67 protein is expressed during cell cycle and for a short duration (3-4 days) thereafter (De Boer and Perelson, 2013; Gossel et al., 2017). Measuring Ki67 expression simultaneously with BrdU uptake therefore provides both recent and historical proliferation information from the same cell.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
Data analysis


Notes
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This protocol was developed for a published study (Gossel et al., 2017), supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI093870) and the Medical Research Council (MC-PC-13055). The authors declare no conflicts of interest or competing interests.
References
Article Information
Copyright
Hogan et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
How to cite
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:
Category
Immunology > Immune cell staining > Flow cytometry
Cell Biology > Cell-based analysis > Flow cytometry
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link

