Published: Vol 7, Iss 1, Jan 5, 2017 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2095 Views: 28303
Reviewed by: Antoine de MorreeXiaoyi ZhengVaibhav B Shah
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Separation of Microspores from Anthers of Lilium longiflorum (Lily) and Subsequent RNA Extraction
Ming-Che Liu [...] Co-Shine Wang
Feb 20, 2015 10014 Views
Low-cost and High-throughput RNA-seq Library Preparation for Illumina Sequencing from Plant Tissue
Marta Bjornson [...] Pingtao Ding
Oct 20, 2020 7007 Views
A Highly Efficient System for Separating Glandular and Non-glandular Trichome of Cucumber Fruit for Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis
Lei Sun [...] Xingwang Liu
Jan 5, 2025 799 Views
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal modification of eukaryotic messenger RNA (mRNA). The total amount of m6A can be detected by several methods, such as dot blot analysis using specific m6A antibodies and quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Fu et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2016). Here we describe the method for fast detection of total m6A levels in mRNA by dot blot analysis using a specific m6A antibody.
Keywords: Dot blotBackground
Dot blot analysis for detecting total m6A levels in mRNA is relatively easy, fast, and cost-effective as compared to other methods, such as two-dimensional thin layer chromatography and LC-MS/MS. This approach can be used, in a qualitative manner, to evaluate temporal and spatial changes in m6A levels in various plant tissues or plants at different developmental stages. This is particularly useful for initial examination of changes in m6A levels in relevant mutants prior to detailed investigations by other complex and quantitative approaches.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Data analysis
As dot blot analysis is a semi-quantitative approach, the analysis should be repeated through the above procedures using independent biological materials. Only the repeatable changes in m6A levels observed in independent materials as compared to the wild-type control are considered ‘positive’ results, which may be further investigated by other quantitative approaches. In addition, the signals from the dot blot images can be quantified by ImageJ and the statistical analysis should be based on at least three biological replicates.
Representative data
For representative data, please see the paper of Shen et al., 2016.
Notes
This protocol is also applicable to detect other types of RNA modifications if the corresponding specific primary antibodies and secondary antibodies are available.
Recipes
Note: It is unnecessary to use RNase-free water to prepare the above solutions.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Academic Research Fund (MOE2015-T2-1-002) from the Ministry of Education-Singapore, the Singapore National Research Foundation Investigatorship Programme (NRF-NRFI2016-02), and the intramural research support from National University of Singapore and Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory.
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Shen, L., Liang, Z. and Yu, H. (2017). Dot Blot Analysis of N6-methyladenosine RNA Modification Levels. Bio-protocol 7(1): e2095. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2095.
Category
Plant Science > Plant biochemistry > RNA
Molecular Biology > RNA > RNA detection
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link