Published: Vol 6, Iss 22, Nov 20, 2016 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2018 Views: 9050
Reviewed by: Yannick DebingAngela CoronaRosario Gomez-Garcia
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Ub-POD: A Ubiquitin-Specific Proximity-Dependent Labeling Technique to Identify E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrates in Human Cells
Urbi Mukhopadhyay [...] Sagar Bhogaraju
Jun 20, 2025 802 Views
Inducible HIV-1 Reservoir Reduction Assay (HIVRRA), a Fast and Sensitive Assay to Test Cytotoxicity and Potency of Cure Strategies to Reduce the Replication-Competent HIV-1 Reservoir in Ex Vivo PBMCs
Jade Jansen [...] Neeltje A. Kootstra
Jul 20, 2025 1035 Views
Assembly and Mutagenesis of Human Coronavirus OC43 Genomes in Yeast via Transformation-Associated Recombination
Brett A. Duguay and Craig McCormick
Aug 20, 2025 972 Views
Abstract
Interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) is a transcription factor, which is critical for the antiviral response against a wide range of viruses (Hiscott, 2007; Ikushima et al., 2013). It gets activated in virus-infected cells via Toll like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I (retinoic acid inducible gene 1) like receptors (RLRs), cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) – stimulator of interferon genes (STING), which are sensors of viral components in the cells (Chattopadhyay and Sen, 2014a; 2014b; Hiscott, 2007). IRF3 is a cytoplasmic protein, upon activation by virally activated sensors it gets phosphorylated, translocated to the nucleus and binds to the interferon-sensitive response element (ISRE) of the gene promoters to induce their transcription (Hiscott, 2007). IRF3 has other functions, including direct stimulation of apoptosis in virus-infected cells. In this pathway, the transcriptional activity of IRF3 is not required (Chattopadhyay et al., 2013b; Chattopadhyay et al., 2016; Chattopadhyay et al., 2010; Chattopadhyay and Sen, 2010; Chattopadhyay et al., 2011). These pathways are negatively regulated by host factors as well as by viruses. Our studies indicate that IRF3 can be proteolytically processed by caspase-8-dependent cleavage (Sears et al., 2011). A specific site in IRF3 is targeted by caspase-8, activated in RNA or DNA virus-infected and dsRNA-stimulated cells (Sears et al., 2011). The direct involvement of caspase-8 was confirmed by in vitro cleavage assay using recombinant proteins and in vivo by virus activated caspase-8. The proteolytic cleavage of IRF3 can be inhibited by chemical inhibition or genetic ablation of caspase-8. The cleavage of IRF3 removes the activated pool of IRF3 and thus can be used as a pro-viral mechanism (Figure 1). Using a C-terminally epitope-tagged human IRF3, we analyzed the cleavage of IRF3 in virus-infected cells. Moreover, we used recombinant proteins in vitro to conclude that IRF3 is a substrate of caspase-8 (Sears et al., 2011). In the current protocol, we have outlined a simple and detailed procedure to biochemically analyze the proteolysis of IRF3 in virus-infected cells and the specific role of caspase-8 in this process.
Figure 1. Model for virus-induced caspase-8-dependent proteolysis of IRF3. In virus-infected cells, IRF3 can be proteolytically cleaved by caspase-8, which gets activated during infection. The cleaved IRF3 is subjected to poly-ubiquitination (Ub) and degradation by proteasome machinery. The degradation of IRF3 inhibits dsRNA-induced antiviral gene induction.
Background
IRF3 functions as a transcription factor as well as a pro-apoptotic factor in virus-infected cells. The two properties of IRF3 determine its overall antiviral functions. Our studies have revealed a number of additional regulatory mechanisms of IRF3 for both of its functions. Using genetically modified cells and mice, we have shown how the two functional branches of IRF3 protect against virus infections (Chattopadhyay et al., 2013a; Chattopadhyay et al., 2016; Chattopadhyay et al., 2011). Dysregulated IRF3 activation is undesirable for normal physiological functions and, therefore, negative regulatory mechanisms are in place to control continuous activation of IRF3. In virus-infected cells, IRF3 can be proteolytically cleaved at a specific site by caspase-8, which gets activated by TLR or RLR signaling. The proteolytic cleavage of IRF3 prevents unregulated expression of dsRNA-dependent genes (Sears et al., 2011). We speculate that such mechanisms are used by viruses to promote their replication and to downregulate IRF3 responses. Therefore, the proteolysis of IRF3 represents a critical step, which both the viruses and the host can regulate to their favorable outcomes. This protocol provides a method to biochemically analyze the proteolysis of IRF3 in virus-infected cells.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Notes
Special care should be taken to separate the cleaved (~45 kDa), and the full length (~55 kDa), forms of IRF3, by electrophoresing the SDS gel (10%) at 100 V for longer time (when the protein ladders indicate clear separation of the desired sizes).
Recipes
Acknowledgments
Our work is supported by American Heart Association Scientist Development grants 15SDG25090212 (SC) and 15SDG2308025 (RC), and the University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences startup funds (SC). The protocol and the representative results were adapted from our previous work (Sears et al., 2011).
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2016 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:
Category
Microbiology > Microbe-host interactions > Virus
Molecular Biology > Protein > Protein-protein interaction
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link