Published: Vol 9, Iss 8, Apr 20, 2019 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3218 Views: 4741
Reviewed by: Shailesh KumarSalim GasmiAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
A Fluorescence-Based Flippase Assay to Monitor Lipid Transport by Drs2-Cdc50
Inja M. Van Der Linden [...] Huriye D. Uzun
Jul 20, 2025 1629 Views
Fluorescence Polarization-Based High-Throughput Screening Assay for Inhibitors Targeting Cathepsin L
Keyu Guo [...] Shuyi Si
Jul 20, 2025 796 Views
An Optimized Enzyme-Coupled Spectrophotometric Method for Measuring Pyruvate Kinase Kinetics
Saurabh Upadhyay
Aug 20, 2025 781 Views
Abstract
AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) is a trimeric protein holoenzyme with kinase activity. AMPK plays an important role in cellular metabolism and is thought to function as a fuel sensor within the cell, exerting kinase activity to activate energy-conserving pathways and simultaneously inhibit energy-consuming pathways. Traditional in vitro methods to measure AMPK activity to test potential agonists or antagonists utilize radiolabeled ATP with a peptide substrate. Although radiolabeling provides a high level of sensitivity, this approach is not ideal for medium to high-throughput screening, dose-response curves, or kinetic analyses. Our protocol utilizes Invitrogen’s Z’-LYTETM Kinase Assay Kit (Ser/Thr 23 Peptide) to measure changes in the enzymatic activity of AMPKɑ2β1γ1 in the presence of a molecular chaperone. The Z’-LYTETM platform is based on Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET). The AMPK peptide substrate (S/T 23 peptide: MRPRKRQGSVRRRV) is a self-contained FRET system, using coumarin as the donor and fluorescein as the acceptor. When the peptide is phosphorylated, it is sensitive to cleavage by a site-specific protease. The cleavage of the phospho-peptide eliminates the FRET pair, and the ratiometric analysis of FRET is used as an indirect measure of AMPK kinase activity. This method does not require the use of radiolabeling or antibodies and is used in a multi-well format, with high reproducibility and throughput capabilities.
Keywords: KinaseBackground
AMPK plays an important role in cellular metabolism (Ross et al., 2016). Dysfunction in AMPK signaling is associated with a wide range of pathophysiological conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, neurological diseases, and aging (Ronnebaum et al., 2014). Therefore, identifying activators and inhibitors of AMPK activity are important both in the development of therapeutics and to study off-target effects of other small molecules. We previously determined the chaperone effect of the enzyme CHIP on AMPKα1 and AMPKα2 holoenyzmes by measuring the phosphorylation of the SAMS peptide in the presence of radiolabeled ATP (Schisler et al., 2013). While sensitive, laboratories commonly utilize a spotting technique (each condition must be spotted individually) that is time sensitive (reactions can saturate within minutes), making dose response experiments and the simultaneous screening of multiple compounds difficult (Hastie et al., 2006). In a more recent study, we adapted a commercial FRET-based assay to study the effect of CHIP mutations on AMPK activity (Shi et al., 2018).
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
The major steps of this protocol and the different plates used are outlined in Figure 1.
Data analysis
All data is analyzed using the manufacturer’s instructions. Emission data is collected at 445 nm and 520 nm and used to calculate the emission ratio (445/520, Figure 5A). These data are then used to calculate the percent phosphorylation (Figure 5B):
where, Ratio = emission ratio of signal intensity collected at 445 nm divided by signal intensity collected 520 nm from an individual well;
F100% = mean fluorescein (445 nm) emission signal intensity of the 100% phosphorylation control (row K, Figure 4);
C100% = Average coumarin (520 nm) emission signal intensity of the 100% phosphorylation control (row K, Figure 4);
F0% = Average fluorescein emission signal intensity of the 0% phosphorylation control (row J, Figure 4);
C0% = Average coumarin emission signal intensity of the 0% phosphorylation control (row J, Figure 4).
We first determined the concentration of AMPK to be used in our reactions. Our study focused on agonist activity, however it is ideal to use conditions that can account for either direction of change in AMPK activity. This can be accomplished by first measuring the Z’-factor. The Z’-factor is a measure of statistical effect size (1 being the highest value) and is used to evaluate sensitivity and variability of the performance of a high throughput assay. Each prep of AMPK should be first tested to determine the starting concentration that yields a phosphorylation level suitable for the assay. In this example, AMPK at 730 nM with ATP at 50 µM resulted in 33% phosphorylation (Figure 5), corresponding to a Z’ value of 0.66 using the manufacture’s calculation. The manufacture suggests assays should be done using AMPK and ATP concentrations that result in 20%-50% peptide phosphorylation, with Z’ values > 0.5.
Figure 5. Data analysis of peptide phosphorylation. A. Raw fluorescence (left axis) and ratiometric values (right axis) of three concentrations of AMPK represented by a scatterplot and summarized by the mean ± 95% confidence interval of three replicate wells. The shaded region indicates the range of the assay, bounded by 0% phosphorylation and 100% phosphorylation controls. B. The calculated percent phosphorylation of peptide with increasing concentrations of AMPK represented by a scatterplot.
Next, use the equation to calculate the percent phosphorylation to the remainder of the wells and plot the percent phosphorylation versus the concentration of the compound of interest, per AMPK concentration (Figure 6A). In our example, we repeated the experiment at 730 nM AMPK two additional times, for a total of three independent runs, demonstrating the effect of the molecular chaperone CHIP on AMPK activity (Figure 6B). Four-parameter curve fitting can be used to generate dose-response curves and EC50 values to compare the effect of different compounds on AMPK. The effect of CHIP mutations on AMPK activity were previously described by comparing the EC50 values of each CHIP mutant (Shi et al., 2018).
Figure 6. Dose response of AMPK and CHIP on peptide phosphorylation. A. The effect of increasing CHIP concentrations on AMPK activity measured by peptide phosphorylation using three different concentrations of AMPK, represented by a scatterplot and summarized by the mean ± 95% confidence interval of three replicate wells per condition. B. The effect of increasing CHIP concentrations on AMPK activity measured by peptide phosphorylation from three independent experiments, represented by a scatterplot and summarized by the mean ± 95% confidence interval of three replicate wells per condition.
Recipes
Note: All buffers should be filter sterilized (0.2 μm).
Acknowledgments
Development of this protocol was supported by NIH grants R01-GM061728 and R37-HL065619. The funder had no role in the design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank members of the Schisler Laboratory for critical review of the protocol and the McAllister Heart Institute administration team for their continued support. Additional data supporting this protocol was previously published (Shi et al., 2018).
Competing interests
There are no conflicts of interest or competing interest.
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2019 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Wilson, E. B., Rubel, C. E. and Schisler, J. C. (2019). Non-radiometric Cell-free Assay to Measure the Effect of Molecular Chaperones on AMP-activated Kinase Activity. Bio-protocol 9(8): e3218. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3218.
Category
Biochemistry > Protein > Activity
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link