Published: Vol 9, Iss 5, Mar 5, 2019 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3188 Views: 16182
Reviewed by: Giusy TornilloZe YangAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Human iPSC-Derived Neuron and Oligodendrocyte Co-culture as a Small-Molecule Screening Assay for Myelination
Stefanie Elke Chie [...] Maria Consolata Miletta
May 5, 2025 1474 Views
Cryopreservation of Bulk-Produced Primary Rat Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells
Hanki Kim [...] Jun Young Choi
Jun 20, 2025 505 Views
Abstract
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) are pluripotent stem cells that can be generated from somatic cells, and provide a way to model the development of neural tissues in vitro. One particularly interesting application of iPSCs is the development of neurons analogous to those found in the human forebrain. Forebrain neurons play a central role in cognition and sensory processing, and deficits in forebrain neuronal activity contributes to a host of conditions, including epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and schizophrenia. Here, we present our protocol for differentiating iPSCs into forebrain neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and neurons, whereby neural rosettes are generated from stem cells without dissociation and NPCs purified from rosettes based on their adhesion, resulting in a more rapid generation of pure NPC cultures. Neural progenitor cells can be maintained as long-term cultures, or differentiated into forebrain neurons. This protocol provides a simplified and fast methodology of generating forebrain NPCs and neurons, and enables researchers to generate effective in vitro models to study forebrain disease and neurodevelopment. This protocol can also be easily adapted to generate other neural lineages.
Keywords: iPSCBackground
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are stem cells produced from non-pluripotent source cells and tissues (Shi et al., 2017). Due to their ability to differentiate into a wide range of cell types, they are a promising avenue for improving our understanding of human development and treatment of degenerative diseases (Marchetto et al., 2011). Of particular interest are iPSC-derived models of human forebrain neurons, as these cells are known to mediate higher order brain functions, including consciousness (Baxter and Chiba, 1999), emotion (Morgane et al., 2005), and sleep (Schwartz and Roth, 2008). As a result, deficits in these cells can cause a wide range of neurological disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s (Auld et al., 2002) and Huntington’s (McColgan and Tabrizi, 2018), as well as neurodevelopmental diseases such as autism (Donovan and Basson, 2017) and epilepsy (Heath, 1976). As there are few effective forebrain models for humans, the discovery of iPSCs spurred a rapid push to develop effective protocols to differentiate iPSCs to forebrain neurons (Srikanth and Young-Pearse, 2014). The first protocols that were developed drew upon previous work using embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which relied upon feeder cell cultures. This complicated the procedure and raised concerns about clinical applications. Later protocols were able to generate forebrain neurons without using feeder cells (Bell et al., 2017), with some eliminating all animal generated products entirely (Yuan et al., 2015). It can be difficult to make an all-encompassing statement about the protocols currently used to generate forebrain NPCs, due to the multitude of labs currently generating forebrain neurons and the many variables that can be changed and optimized. However, many of the recently most cited published protocols for the generation of forebrain NPCs and neurons can be divided into two kinds, monolayer and embryoid bodies (EBs) protocols. In an EB based protocol, iPSCs are dissociated and plated in suspension in a neural induction media to allow them to form EBs, which gradually aggregate over 5-7 days (Pasca et al., 2011). These EBs are then transferred to a plate that supports cell attachment, enabling the embryoid bodies to attach to the bottom of the plate and spread out into a neural rosette. From this rosette, neural stem cells (NSCs) arise, which can be passaged to form relatively stable neural progenitors cells (NPCs) (Shi et al., 2012). NPCs can then be plated in a neuronal induction media to give rise to mature neurons (Bell et al., 2017). Monolayer based protocols chiefly differ in that iPSC colonies are maintained as a monolayer during neural induction, and develop directly into rosettes without aggregation (Chandrasekaran et al., 2017). Using either approach, generation of NPCs from iPSCs is typically reported to require 21-30 days, with electrically active neurons requiring an additional 30+ days of differentiation from NPCs, for a total time of 50+ days to generate forebrain neurons from iPSCs (Yuan et al., 2015).
This protocol describes a methodology for generating forebrain neurons from iPSCs, where iPSC colonies are induced to form neural rosettes without mechanical dissociation, and neural progenitor cells are purified from immature clusters of neural cells, known as neural rosettes based on differential adhesion. Neural progenitor cells will not attach to non-adherent plates and aggregate together in a floating mass, while other cells types either adhere or float but do not aggregate with NPCs (Bell et al., 2017). This allows rapid purification of NPCs, has the potential for automation and enables the generation of NPC cultures within 14 days of initiation of differentiation. This modification does not appear to negatively influence the fate of the cells, as we observe uniform staining for key neural progenitor cells markers (Zhang et al., 2010; Venere et al., 2012; Zhang and Jiao, 2015). Indeed, we have found that we are capable of recording electrical activity from neurons consistently in as little as five days of differentiation from NPCs. This protocol can be used to generate forebrain neurons simply and effectively for use in investigating neurodevelopment, the etiology of diseases that affect the forebrain, and drug testing.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Figure 2. Morphology of iPSCs differentiating into forebrain NPCs. A. Day 0: Showing a single iPSC colony of appropriate size immediately prior to addition of Neural Induction Media 1. B. Day 2: The iPSC colony, which has been treated with Neural Induction Media 1 for 2 days, begins to change cellular morphology and some cells extend processes. C. Day 5: Increased expansion of the colony with some differentiation of outer cells. D. Day 12: Appearance of rosettes in the colony become visible. NSCs are present in high confluence in the middle of these structures. It is at this point that colonies are detached and re-plated on non-adherent plates at D13 for two days. E. D13 immediately after plating on adherent plates. This image shows floating rosette colonies that will continue to proliferate and differentiate in a floating mass. Non-rosette cells either remained on the dish at D12 after chemical release or float as single cells on the non-adherent plates shown in (E). F. At D15, rosette clusters expand in size and are moved to adherent plates. Cell aggregates here are 3-dimensional, but are attached to the plate. Note the purity of the clusters at this point (F). Scale bars represent 130 µm.
Data analysis
Electrophysiological data should be processed with currents should be filtered at 2 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz. Values should be reported correcting for the nominal membrane potential in voltage- and current-clamp recordings for the calculated 10-mV liquid junction potential.
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Canada Research Chairs program and the Canadian Institute of Health Research to CE. Scott Bell is funded by the (Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec) FRQS, Nuwan Hettige is funded by FRQS, Malvin Jefri is supported by the Government of Malaysia, and Lilit Antonyan is supported by CONACYT (Mexico). This protocol was adapted from previous work (Bell et al., 2017 and 2018).
Competing interests
Carl Ernst is president of ManuStem.com.
Ethics
All work was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Douglas Hospital.
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2019 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Bell, S., Hettige, N. C., Silveira, H., Peng, H., Wu, H., Jefri, M., Antonyan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X. and Ernst, C. (2019). Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) into an Effective Model of Forebrain Neural Progenitor Cells and Mature Neurons. Bio-protocol 9(5): e3188. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3188.
Category
Stem Cell > Pluripotent stem cell > Cell differentiation
Neuroscience > Cellular mechanisms > Cell isolation and culture
Cell Biology > Cell isolation and culture > Cell differentiation
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link