Published: Vol 7, Iss 7, Apr 5, 2017 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2202 Views: 11720
Reviewed by: Marisa RosaNing LiuAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
A Semi-throughput Procedure for Assaying Plant NADP-malate Dehydrogenase Activity Using a Plate Reader
Kevin Baudry and Emmanuelle Issakidis-Bourguet
Aug 20, 2023 630 Views
An in vitro Assay to Probe the Formation of Biomolecular Condensates
Yu Zhang and Shen Lisha
Sep 5, 2023 2041 Views
Immunofluorescence for Detection of TOR Kinase Activity In Situ in Photosynthetic Organisms
Ana P. Lando [...] Giselle M. A. Martínez-Noël
Dec 20, 2024 795 Views
Abstract
Induction and secretion of acid phosphatase (APase) is a universal adaptive response of higher plants to low-phosphate stress (Tran et al., 2010). The intracellular APases are likely involved in the remobilization and recycling of phosphate (Pi) from intracellular Pi reserves, whereas the extracellular or secreted APases are believed to release Pi from organophosphate compounds in the rhizosphere. The phosphate starvation-induced secreted APases can be released into the rhizosphere or retained on root surfaces (root-associated APases). In this article, we describe the protocols for analyzing root-secreted APase activity in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). In Arabidopsis, the activity of both root-associated APases and APases that are released into the rhizosphere can be quantified based on their ability to cleave a synthesized substrate, para-nitrophenyl-phosphate (pNPP), which releases a yellow product, para-nitrophenol (pNP) (Wang et al., 2011 and 2104). The root-associated APase activity can also be directly visualized by applying a chromogenic substrate, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP), to the root surface (Lloyd et al., 2001; Tomscha et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2011 and 2014) whereas the isozymes of APases that are released into rhizosphere can be profiled using an in-gel assay (Trull and Deikman, 1998; Tomscha et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2011 and 2014). The protocol for analysis of intracellular APase activity in Arabidopsis has been previously described (Vicki and William, 2013).
Keywords: Arabidopsis thalianaBackground
Phosphate (Pi) is the major form of phosphorus that plants take up through their root systems, and Pi levels in most soils are low, resulting in Pi starvation. To cope with this nutritional stress, plants trigger an array of adaptive responses that increase their survival and growth. Induction and secretion of APases is a hallmark Pi starvation response that has been documented in a variety of plant species (Tran et al., 2010), and root-secreted APase activity has been widely used as a diagnostic tool to evaluate the magnitude of plant responses to Pi starvation. In this article, we provide three protocols for assay of root-secreted APase activity. An assay using pNPP as a substrate is the most commonly used method to quantify APase activity. A BCIP staining assay provides a simple, one-step method for the histochemical detection of APase activity on the root surface. Neither of these methods, however, can reveal the number of APase isoforms that contribute to the observed activity. A third method (in-gel assay), which combines electrophoresis, protein renaturation, and conversion of a substrate into a red-brown product, can reveal the diverse compositions of APase isoforms in different samples, and can therefore provide additional information about root-secreted APases.
Materials and Reagents
*Note: Similar reagents from any qualified company are suitable for this experiment.
Equipment
**Note: Similar equipment from any qualified company is suitable for this experiment.
Software
Procedure
Stock solution | 5% stacking gel (5 ml) | 10% separating gel (10 ml) |
30% Acrylamide/Bis solution | 0.83 ml | 3.3 ml |
1.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.8 | - | 2.5 ml |
1 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8 | 0.63 ml | - |
10% SDS | 0.05 ml | 0.1 ml |
10% (NH4)2S2O8 | 0.05 ml | 0.1 ml |
TEMED | 0.005 ml | 0.004 ml |
ddH2O | 3.40 ml | 4.0 ml |
Notes
Recipes
NH4NO3 | 20.62 mM | CuSO4 | 0.1 µM |
KNO3 | 18.79 mM | Fe-EDTA | 100 µM |
CaCl2 | 2.99 mM | Myo inositol | 0.55 µM |
MgSO4 | 1.5 mM | Nicotinic acid | 4.1 µM |
KH2PO4 | 1.25 mM | Pyridoxine HCl | 2.4 µM |
K2SO4 | 0.625 mM | Thiamine HCl | 0.3 µM |
KI | 5 µM | Glycine | 30 µM |
H3BO3 | 100 µM | ||
MnSO4 | 92.5 µM | Sucrose | 10 g/L |
ZnSO4 | 30 µM | MES | 5.1 g/L |
NaMoO4 | 1 µM | pH | 5.8 |
CoCl2 | 0.1 µM | Agar | 10 g/L |
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 31370290 and 30670170).
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the original research article where this protocol was used:
Category
Plant Science > Plant biochemistry > Protein
Biochemistry > Protein > Activity
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link