EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine) based cell proliferation assay in vivo (Sivaraj et al., 2020)
1. For retina, P6 pups received 100 µg of EdU in 50 µl (2mg/ml)per 3g of body weight intraperitoneally for 2 hr.
2. P6 pups were sacrificed and whole eyes were harvested and fixed in ice cold 4% PFA for 2 hr.
3. After fixation, retinas were dissected and processed as described previously (Pitulescu et al., 2010).
4. After two washes with ice-cold PBS, samples were incubated in blocking buffer for 1 hr on rotating shaker.
5. Next, blocking buffer was replaced by Pblec buffer.
6. Isolectin-B4 (IB4; Vector, Cat#Ab200839) or rabbit monoclonal anti-ERG (Abcam, Cat# ab22552) were diluted in Pblec buffer and each retina was incubated in 100 μl of solution overnight at 4°C.
7. Next, samples were washed five times in incubation buffer (diluted blocking buffer 1:1 in PBS) and incubated with the appropriate Alexa Fluor488, 546 and 594-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 hr at room temperature.
8. Retinas were washed three times with ice-cold PBS.
9. Retinas were incubated with Click-it EdU stock solutions for 30 minutes at room temperature, protected from light.
10. Retinas were washed three-five times with ice-cold blocking buffer.
11. Later, retinas were incubated with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (1 µg/ml) in blocking buffer for 10 minutes at room temperature, protected from light.
12. Finally, retinas were washed three- five times with ice-cold PBS and mounted under a stereomicroscope.
Solutions:
1. EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine) 1mg/ml (i.e. 2mg EdU, dissolve in 100ul DMSO by vortexing, add 900ul of PBS to a final volume of 1ml).
3. Pblec buffer (1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM MnCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS).
4. Click-it EdU stock solutions (for 100ul of staining solution mix):
10x Click-it EdU reaction buffer
10 µl
CuSO4
4 µl
Alexa Fluor Azide 647
0.25 µl
10x Click/it EdU buffer additive
10 µl
water
75.75 µl
Click-it EdU stock solutions
100 µl
References
1. Pitulescu, M.E., Schmidt, I., Benedito, R., and Adams, R.H. (2010). Inducible gene targeting in the neonatal vasculature and analysis of retinal angiogenesis in mice. Nature protocols 5, 1518-1534.
2. Sivaraj, K.K., Dharmalingam, B., Mohanakrishnan, V., Jeong, H.W., Kato, K., Schroder, S., Adams, S., Koh, G.Y., and Adams, R.H. (2020). YAP1 and TAZ negatively control bone angiogenesis by limiting hypoxia-inducible factor signaling in endothelial cells. eLife 9.
Copyright: Content may be subjected to copyright.
How to cite:
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol preprint and the original research article where this protocol was used:
Sivaraj, K and Adams, R(2020). Proliferation assay in vivo. Bio-protocol Preprint. bio-protocol.org/prep658.
Sivaraj, K. K., Dharmalingam, B., Mohanakrishnan, V., Jeong, H., Kato, K., Schröder, S., Adams, S., Koh, G. Y. and Adams, R. H.(2020). YAP1 and TAZ negatively control bone angiogenesis by limiting hypoxia-inducible factor signaling in endothelial cells. eLife. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50770
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this
article to respond.
0/150
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Spinning
Post a Question
0 Q&A
Spinning
This protocol preprint was submitted via the "Request
a Protocol" track.