If an estimate of for the reference population is available, the accuracy of GEBV in the reference population can be estimated using Eqs. (1), (2), and (3) to predict Cross-validation or pseudoBLUP methodology can be used to predict These two accuracies can then be combined to predict using either the Fisher approach (Eqs. (6) and (7)) or the Index approach (Eq. (9)).
If for the reference population is not known, it can be derived using different approaches:
Based on theoretical functions of effective population size (), reference size (), and genome size in terms of number of chromosomes () and the individual or average ( in Morgans) size of chromosomes [5, 7, 9, 14]. Here, two such theoretical predictions of will be used: based on [8], and based on [7].
Based on the inverse of the variance of relationships [8]. Because is used to estimate the accuracy of DEBV, the variance of genomic minus pedigree relationships among all pairs of individuals in the reference population was used.
Based on observed accuracies of GEBV and of PEBV in the reference population, and , using the relationships among the accuracies derived above based on either the Fisher or the Index approach:
Using the Fisher approach, and can be computed from the observed and using Eq. (4), with . Fisher information statistic can then be computed as based on Eq. (5). Substituting Eq. (3) into Eq. (2) results in the following quadratic form in : , which can be solved for as:
Using the Index approach, can be computed from the observed and using Eq. (9), which can then be used to compute for a given value of using Eq. (6). can then be derived from using Eq. (2), resulting in:
Because based on Eq. (3), the solution for must be obtained in an iterative manner by substituting the new value of based on Eq. (3) back into Eq. (11) until a stable value of is obtained (see Appendix 1).
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.