Analyses were conducted using the “sqldf,” “biomaRt,” “TwoSampleMR,” “MendelianRandomization,” or “simex” modules in the R package (version 4.0.3). In general, statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. In the case of multiple testing, the threshold for statistical significance was adjusted by the conservative Bonferroni correction according to the formula p < 0.05/n, where n referred to the number of MR tests. Since the present study included five forward and one reverse two-sample MR analyses, the adjusted p-values for the forward and reverse MR tests were, respectively, 0.01 (0.05/5) and 0.05 (0.05/1). When a p-value for an association was below the adjusted cut-off value, the association was considered statistically significant as a causal association. When a p-value was below 0.05 but equal to or greater than the adjusted cut-off value, the association was considered one of potential causality needing further confirmation. When a p-value was equal to or >0.05, it was considered not to be causal.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.