2.2. Succinylation of lysozyme

KW Katharina Wørzner
JH Jóhanna Hvannastein
SS Signe Tandrup Schmidt
CF Camilla Foged
IR Ida Rosenkrands
GP Gabriel Kristian Pedersen
DC Dennis Christensen
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Succinylation of LYS was performed essentially as reported previously [22] with minor alterations. The succinylation reaction was conducted at four different theoretical molar ratios of succinic anhydride to LYS, i.e. 100, 10, 5 and 0.5, respectively, and the resulting LYS analogues are denoted LYS-100, LYS-10, LYS-5 and LYS-0.5. Unmodified lysozyme is simply denoted LYS. LYS was dissolved in sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 8) to a concentration of 20 mg/ml. Depending on the desired molar ratio, succinic anhydride was dissolved in 250 (LYS-10 (70 mg/ml), LYS-5 and LYS-0.5 (35 mg/ml)) or 500 (LYS-100 (340 mg/ml)) µl DMSO, respectively. The succinic anhydride solutions was added to the protein solutions (12.5 ml) in small aliquots over a period of 60 min under constant stirring. For the LYS-0.5, only 25 µl succinic anhydride and DMSO solution (35 mg/ml) was added over a period of 10 min, resulting in a succinic anhydride to lysozyme molar ratio of 0.5. The pH was maintained at 8–9 by adjusting the pH with 0.1 M NaOH solution. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 30 min at 4 °C. The LYS analogues were dialyzed for two days against deionized water using a volume corresponding to at least 200 times the sample volume in Slide-A-Lyzer™ Dialysis Cassettes (12–30 ml, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The analogues were filtered through 0.2 nm Minisart® filters (Sartorius Stedim Biotech Göttingen, Germany). The final protein concentration was determined by UV spectroscopy at 280 nm using a NanoDrop™ 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

The theoretical pI values of the succinylated LYS analogues were estimated from the amino acid sequence of hen egg white lysozyme [23]. The pI values were calculated using the online ProtParam tool program [24] applying a molar extinction coefficient, ε, of 37,370 M−1 cm−1 (A0.1% = 2.653 mg ml−1 cm−1), by replacing lysine (K) and tyrosine residues (Y) with glutamate (E) residues (Supplementary Fig. 1). ProtParam does not allow for replacement of the N-terminal amine group, hence succinylation of this group was not accounted for in the calculations.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A