Pairwise alignments were generated using lastz v1.0271, with the following parameters: “B = 2 C = 0 E = 150 H = 0 K = 4500 L = 3000 M = 254 O = 600 Q = human_chimp.v2.q T = 2 Y = 15,000”. This was followed by using USCS genome utilities (https://genome.ucsc.edu/util.html, https://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/admin/exe/linux.x86_64/FOOTER) axtChain tool with -minScore = 5000. Additional tools with default parameters were then used following the UCSC whole-genome alignment paradigm (http://genomewiki.ucsc.edu/index.php/Whole_genome_alignment_howto) in order to obtain a contiguous pairwise alignment. Multiple alignments were generated from pairwise alignments with the multiz v11.272 program, using default parameters and the following pre-determined phylogenetic tree: ((((M. zebra, P. nyererei), A. burtoni), N. brichardi), O. niloticus) in agreement with Brawand et al.35. Sequence conservation scores were then obtained using PhastCons73 with a phylogenetic model estimated by the phyloFit74 program, both from the PHAST software package (v.1.3). The model fitting was done using default parameters. PhastCons was run in two iterations, first to obtain the free parameters of the model (-estimate-trees and -no-post-probs) and then using the output from this we ran PhastCons again to attain the conservation scores with—target-coverage 0.3—expected-length 100.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.