HCoV 229E Antiviral Assay

EF Ethan J. Fritch
TL Thomas R. Lane
LT Longping V. Tse
BY Boyd L. Yount
CS Carolina Q. Sacramento
NF Natalia Fintelman-Rodrigues
TT Tatyana Almeida Tavella
FC Fabio Trindade Maranhão Costa
SW Stuart Weston
JL James Logue
MF Matthew Frieman
LP Lakshmanane Premkumar
KP Kenneth H. Pearce
BH Brett L. Hurst
CA Carolina Horta Andrade
JL James A. Levi
NJ Nicole J. Johnson
SK Samantha C. Kisthardt
FS Frank Scholle
TS Thiago Moreno L. Souza
NM Nathaniel John Moorman
RB Ralph S. Baric
PM Peter B. Madrid
ask Ask a question
Favorite

HCoV 229E (a gift from Ralph Baric, UNC, Chapel Hill) was propagated on Huh-7 cells, and titers were determined by the TCID50 assay on Huh-7 cells. Huh-7 cells were plated at a density of 25,000 cells per well in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were infected with HCoV 229E at an MOI of 0.1 in a volume of 50 μL of MEM 1 + 1 + 1 [modified Eagle’s medium, 1% FBS, 1% antibiotics, 1% N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer] for 1 h. The virus was removed, cells were rinsed once with PBS, and compounds were added at the indicated concentrations in a volume of 100 μL. Supernatants were harvested after 24 h, which were serially 10-fold diluted, and virus titer was determined by the TCID50 assay on Huh-7 cells. CPE was monitored by visual inspection at 96 h post infection. TCID50 titers were calculated using the Spearmann-Karber method.105,106

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A