2.2.2. Mutation-Level Features

ID Ionut Dragomir
AA Adnan Akbar
JC John W. Cassidy
NP Nirmesh Patel
HC Harry W. Clifford
GC Gianmarco Contino
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Features on a mutation-level were computed using the web interface of Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) based on Ensembl genome database (release 100, April 2020), which annotates genomic variants based on their consequence [26]. Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) and Polymorphism Phenotyping (PolyPhen) scores were chosen, as they show the potential impact of amino acid substitutions on the protein function [27,28], while Consensus Deleteriousness (Condel) scores indicate the probability of a single base mutation of being deleterious [29]. Thus, a SIFT score of 0 represents the most deleterious variant while a PolyPhen or a Condel score of 1 shows the variant with the highest deleterious potential. Additional rank scores were extracted from the database for Nonsynonymous SNPs’ Functional Predictions (dbNSFP), which provides pathogenicity scores from multiple popular algorithms [30]. The highest rank score for each mutation was chosen and then the average value between all scores was calculated based on the rationale that the highest rank score will show the potentially most damaging effect, while the arithmetic mean will reflect the overall pathogenic consequence. A full list of all rank scores used for the computation can be found in Supplementary Table S2: List of features used to compute the average rank score.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A