Randomisation and masking

TH Timothy S C Hinks
LC Lucy Cureton
RK Ruth Knight
AW Ariel Wang
JC Jennifer L Cane
VB Vicki S Barber
JB Joanna Black
SD Susan J Dutton
JM James Melhorn
MJ Maisha Jabeen
PM Phil Moss
RG Rajendar Garlapati
TB Tanya Baron
GJ Graham Johnson
FC Fleur Cantle
DC David Clarke
SE Samer Elkhodair
JU Jonathan Underwood
DL Daniel Lasserson
IP Ian D Pavord
SM Sophie Morgan
DR Duncan Richards
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either azithromycin plus standard care or standard care alone using a web-based automated service, with a minimisation algorithm to ensure balanced allocation across treatment groups, stratified by centre, sex, and presence of hypertension and diabetes. To ensure the unpredictability of treatment allocation, the first 30 participants were randomly assigned by simple randomisation and the minimisation algorithm included a probabilistic element (participants had an 80% chance of being allocated to the treatment, which minimised imbalance between the groups). Patients, investigators, and health-care providers were not masked to study drug assignment.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A