To acquire baseline and follow-up data, dental impressions with a polyether impressions material (Impregum Penta; 3 M, Seefeld, Germany) were taken after placement of restorations (baseline) and annual recall appointments (follow-up). Mean monitoring time in both groups was 350 ± 86 days (1st year), 755 ± 92 days (2nd year), 1102 ± 97 days (3rd year). All impressions were casted between 24 and 48 h with type 4 dental stone (Plurastone; Pluradent, Offenbach, Germany). Resulting plaster casts were digitalized with a laboratory scanner (D810; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and exported to standard tessellation language (STL) file format.
Copyright and License information: The Author(s) ©2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this
article to respond.