Comparison With Baseline Models

XL Xiaoli Liu
TL Tongbo Liu
ZZ Zhengbo Zhang
PK Po-Chih Kuo
HX Haoran Xu
ZY Zhicheng Yang
KL Ke Lan
PL Peiyao Li
ZO Zhenchao Ouyang
YN Yeuk Lam Ng
WY Wei Yan
DL Deyu Li
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To further investigate the performance of TOP-Net, we designed subexperiments 1, 2, and 3 to obtain a comprehensive assessment. In subexperiment 1, the model was acquired without considering personal information and bidirection memory functions. That is, LSTM and convolutional neural network models were obtained in a total cohort without considering the personal information of patients. The structure of the LSTM was consistent with that of a BiLSTM, and the convolutional neural network model had 2 convolutional layers. In subexperiment 2, conventional machine learning methods, including extreme gradient boosting [49], multilayer perceptron, and random forest, were compared with TOP-Net with default model parameters. In subexperiment 3, different feature combinations were examined: (1) all vital signs, (2) heart rate, (3) heart rate and respiratory rate, and (4) heart rate and SpO2.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A