In this section we expand the simplifying assumption of mapping networks with constant set sizes, allowing now for sizes to be distributed according to q(s). The method in the previous section, where we mapped with fixed set sizes, is a special case of this with .
Given an edge between two sets of sizes and drawn from q(s), edges are introduced into the node-level network. The expected number of links at the node level is therefore the number of rules multiplied by a factor of . The expected density can then be expressed as
when . Thus, the overall density is not expected to differ from the ER network, even with variable set sizes.
To derive the degree distribution, we consider a set with degree at the set-level network. Such a set contains nodes, each with the same degree . Depending on q(s) and the degree distribution of the set-level network, the resulting expected degree distribution of the node-level network is given by
According to the law of total expectation and the law of total variance,
and
If the set-level model is an ER network, having Poisson degree distribution with , (12) simplifies to . The GM(ER) model under variable set size therefore has a degree distribution with Fano-factor (as a measure of dispersion) .
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.