2.3.2. Constructing and comparing PSR-networks

LS Lea Schumacher
JB Julian Burger
FZ Fionna Zoellner
AZ Areej Zindler
SE Sacha Epskamp
DB Dana Barthel
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Based on clinicians’ PSR, one network per clinician was constructed (four in total). Clinicians’ indications on the strength of the relation between a symptom pair were used as edges weights (‘do not relate’ = 0, ‘relate weakly positive/negative’ = (−)0.2, ‘relate positive/negative’ = (−)0.5, ‘relate strongly positive/negative’ = (−)0.7, ‘relate very strongly positive/negative’ = (−)1). Through averaging edge weights for each symptom pair an average PSR-network was created. Strength and expected influence of each symptom were investigated for all PSR-networks. To assess the similarity of the individual PSR-networks, the edge weights and centrality indices (strength and expected influence) of all PSR-networks were correlated with each other. Further, to inspect the similarity of the general structure of these networks, we assessed the number of edges on which the individual PSR-networks agreed regarding the presence or absence of the edge.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A