Heterogeneity was assessed for the individual meta-analyses using the chi squared test and the
I
2
statistic
29
. Significant heterogeneity was defined as
P
< 0.05, with
I
2
> 50 % indicating substantial heterogeneity. Further quantification of heterogeneity was categorized based upon
I
2
with values of 25 %, 50 %, and 75 % indicating low, moderate, and high amounts of heterogeneity, respectively. Given the use of random effects model to estimate average effect, a 95 % prediction interval was calculated to determine the dispersion of effects and clearly illustrate heterogeneity in the calculated effect size
30
31
32
.
Copyright and License information: ©2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this
article to respond.