Transmission electron microscopy and podocyte definition were performed by standard protocol described previously.11 Briefly, the arithmetic mean of foot process width (FPW) was estimated as follow:
∑GBM length is the measurement of total GBM length in electron microscope photographs of each AAV patient, where ∑foot process is the calculation of total number of foot processes. The constant π is served for the correction of presumed random variation, which exists inevitably in the angle of section relative to the long axis of the podocyte.19,20 The intraobserver variability of the FPW was assessed by the coefficient of variation (the ratio of the SD to the mean) between 2 measurements of the same object by 1 observer.15 The interobserver variability in this study was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient.21
Podocyte density per glomerulus [Nv(epi/glom)] was used to estimate podocyte detachment (detailed in the Supplementary Material). In brief, the numerical density of podocytes in each glomerulus was calculated as Nv(epi/glom)=(1/1.55) × [Na(epi-nuclei/glom)3/Vv (nuclei/glom)]1/2, where 1.55 is the shape factor for the podocyte nuclei. The calculation of both Na(epi-nuclei/glom) and Vv(epi-nuclei/glom) was performed according to the standard protocol described previously.22
The GBM width was estimated by the orthogonal intercept method in 10,000 × electron microscope micrographs.23
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.