4.1. Site and Plant Management

FA Francisca Alonso
FC Fernando M. Chiamolera
JH Juan J. Hueso
MG Mónica González
JC Julián Cuevas
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

This study was performed in a “Flame Seedless” vineyard located at the Cajamar Foundation Research Center, in El Ejido (Almería, SE Spain) (longitude 2°43′10″ W, latitude 36°47′40″ N). The altitude is 151 m above sea level and the vineyard is 11 km away from the Mediterranean Sea. The experimental area presents a semiarid subtropical Mediterranean climate according to the agroclimatic classification of Papadakis [58], with an average annual temperature around 18.5 °C. December and January are the coolest months and August the warmest. Rain averages 250 mm per year (January to December), while mean annual relative humidity oscillates between 67% and 73% depending on the year. Bright sunny days are common at the experimental site. Sunlight hours reach a mean value of 3273 h per year. The soil is a sandy clay loam with 49.6% sand, 26.4% silt and 24.0% clay, measured at 10–70 cm depth, where most roots of the vines grow.

The “Flame Seedless” vines used for this study were planted in 1999, grafted on 161-49 C rootstock. The vines were arranged on a 3.5 × 3.5 m spacing and trained according to local practices in a 2.1 m high Spanish trellis system (“parral”). The vineyard was divided into two plots (800 m2 per each), one located under a greenhouse structure and the other in the open. The greenhouse was a flat roof structure covered with a three-layer polyethylene plastic film of 0.2 mm thickness, situated 1.40 m above the vine canopy. This greenhouse had two side vents (in the north and south walls, respectively) and four alternately oriented roof flaps vents (west–east) that remained completely open until December of each experimental year to allow vines to fulfill their chilling requirements. Chilling requirements of “Flame Seedless” are estimated in around 150 h below 10 °C by the Utah model of chill units [59]. The opening and closing of the vents was afterward automated and controlled by a climate control system (Mithra Clima, Priva Nutricontrol Ibérica S.L, Cartagena, Spain). The temperature for activating the opening of the windows of the greenhouse was established at 16 °C from bud swelling to bloom, and increased up to 20 °C for the rest of the cycle according to the suggestions made by Colapietra [60]. Daily thermal amplitude was, in spite of the automated opening of the windows, commonly wider within the greenhouse than in the open field (around 15 °C in the greenhouse versus 10 °C in the open field).

Crop load was mainly regulated by pruning, leaving 9–10 canes per vine each one bearing 10 buds, and 4 spurs to form new canes as the replacement for the production of the next year yield. Pruning was performed at the beginning of December in the vines inside the greenhouse, and one month and a half later in the open field. Crop load was later more precisely adjusted by cluster thinning at prebloom, leaving between 50 and 80 clusters per vine depending on the year as the vine aged. Canes were bent to enhance the percentage of buds sprouting. Hydrogen cyanamide was also applied on greenhouse vines at a dose of 5% to increase and advance bud break. This application was performed in mid-December, according to programs derived from previous experiences. Hydrogen cyanamide was not needed in the open field where bud break takes place normally in the experimental site.

The phenology of the experimental vines was monitored every week starting at bud swelling. The examination was carried out by trained technicians on all buds of 3 canes per vine and 9 vines per plot (open field and greenhouse) according to the BBCH scale [61]. Special attention was paid to the determination of bud break (BBCH stage 09; green tissue seen between bud scales), full bloom (BBCH stage 65; 50% of open flowers) and ripening (BBCH stage 89; beginning of harvest). Bud break and full bloom dates were established when 50% of the total buds of the sampled canes in each vine reached these phenological stages [62]. Harvest date was established as the first day we collected clusters where berries had reached a maturity index above 18 [63]. Berry sampling was performed weekly from veraison to ripening to establish this moment. This monitoring was done on a sample of 60 berries per replicate (20 per vine), berries collected from as many colored bunches as possible from each vine from all parts of the bunch (tail, center and shoulders). In the laboratory, the must obtained from each sample, was centrifuged and total soluble solids measured (and expressed as °Brix) with a Shibuya refractometer (Shibuya Optical Co., Ltd., Wako-shi, Japan). Acidity was measured by titration with 0.1 N NaOH to pH 8.2. The maturation index was calculated as the ratio between total soluble solids (measured as °Brix) and titratable acidity (expressed as g/L of tartaric acid) [63].

All vines were grown under nonlimiting conditions of watering and fertilizers and maintained pest-free according to the practices in the area. The crop load was also adequate with yields close to 23 t ha−1, without significant differences between growing conditions and among seasons, with the exceptions of season 2009, when vines in the open field produced significantly more yield than plants grown in the greenhouse due to much heavier clusters (741 versus 343 g, in the open versus greenhouse, respectively).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A