IBD-Mapping of Caprine and Ovine POLYCERATE Loci

AA Aurélie Allais-Bonnet
AH Aurélie Hintermann
MD Marie-Christine Deloche
RC Raphaël Cornette
PB Philippe Bardou
MN Marina Naval-Sanchez
AP Alain Pinton
AH Ashleigh Haruda
CG Cécile Grohs
JZ Jozsef Zakany
DB Daniele Bigi
IM Ivica Medugorac
OP Olivier Putelat
OG Ockert Greyvenstein
TH Tracy Hadfield
SJ Slim Ben Jemaa
GB Gjoko Bunevski
FM Fiona Menzi
NH Nathalie Hirter
JP Julia M Paris
JH John Hedges
IP Isabelle Palhiere
RR Rachel Rupp
JL Johannes A Lenstra
LG Louisa Gidney
JL Joséphine Lesur
RS Renate Schafberg
MS Michael Stache
MW Marie-Dominique Wandhammer
RA Rose-Marie Arbogast
CG Claude Guintard
AB Amandine Blin
AB Abdelhak Boukadiri
JR Julie Rivière
DE Diane Esquerré
CD Cécile Donnadieu
CD Coralie Danchin-Burge
CR Coralie M Reich
DR David G Riley
EM Este van Marle-Koster
NC Noelle Cockett
BH Benjamin J Hayes
CD Cord Drögemüller
JK James Kijas
EP Eric Pailhoux
GT Gwenola Tosser-Klopp
DD Denis Duboule
AC Aurélien Capitan
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Assuming autosomal dominant inheritance and genetic homogeneity in each of the species investigated, all polycerate animals share at least one copy of the same causative mutation and of a surrounding chromosomal segment inherited-by-descent from a common ancestor. Therefore, comparing SNP array genotyping data of two distantly related polycerate animals is expected to reveal a number of Mendelian incompatibilities (i.e., homozygosity for different alleles) throughout their genomes but not within shared IBD segments. Accordingly, we screened Mendelian incompatibilities in all the possible pair combinations of polycerate × polycerate (4H4H pairs) and polycerate × wild-type (4H2H) individuals. Pairs with a proportion of Medelian incompatibilities below 1 percent of the total number of markers tested were declared as constituted of parent and offspring and were not considered in the analysis. Then, for sliding windows of n markers (n set to 10 in goat and 50 in sheep, considering differences in marker density) we scored the numbers of 4H4H pairs and 4H2H pairs for which “no” versus “at least one” Mendelian inconsistency has been recorded. Finally, we compared the contingency tables produced using Fisher’s exact test.

Illumina GoatSNP50 BeadChip genotypes specifically generated for this research and Illumina OvineHD Beadchip genotyping data generated by two previous studies (Greyvenstein et al. 2016; Kijas et al. 2016) were considered in the analyses. Polled (i.e., hornless) animals were removed from the sheep data set. Markers with a minor allele frequency below 5% or which were called in less than 95% of the samples were eliminated. Moreover, in sheep, genotyping data were extracted for markers located in a 10-Mb region (Chr2:127,500,001–138,500,000 on Oar_v4.0 assembly) corresponding approximately to the HOXD gene cluster ±5 Mb and encompassing all the mapping intervals of the POLYCERATE locus reported in the literature (Greyvenstein et al. 2016; He et al. 2016; Kijas et al. 2016; Ren et al. 2016). The final data sets contained 111 cases, 87 controls, and 2,232 markers in sheep and 35 cases, 51 controls, and 48,345 markers in goat.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A