The VSN method overcomes the limitations of log transformations by accommodating negative values and minimizing the inflated variance around low signal intensities. It calibrates between-feature variation through shifting and scaling mechanism in which all the data are adjusted.
Huber et al. and Durbin et al. independently proposed the VSN approach which is a variant of the log-transform (glog2). A two-component model to explain the proportional increase in the variance with the mean intensity of the proteins was proposed [9], [17], [27]; , where is the background signal and is the actual signal. and are the proportional error and background error respectively. However, with background corrected data this can be modelled as . A transformation is used to produce values such that is approximately independent of the mean, . In general, for a matrix, the function implemented fits a normalisation transformation where is the scaling parameter for array which is always ensured to be positive with a parameter transformation , is the background offset included if the data is not background corrected and is the generalised transformation . A robust variant of the maximum likelihood estimator for the 2 parameters is utilised [1]. Each slide is treated independently and slide to slide variation is not considered [10].
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.