2.4.4. Variance stabilization normalization (VSN)

KM Kennedy Mwai
NK Nelson Kibinge
JT James Tuju
GK Gathoni Kamuyu
RK Rinter Kimathi
JM James Mburu
EC Emily Chepsat
LN Lydia Nyamako
TC Timothy Chege
IN Irene Nkumama
SK Samson Kinyanjui
EM Eustasius Musenge
FO Faith Osier
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The VSN method overcomes the limitations of log transformations by accommodating negative values and minimizing the inflated variance around low signal intensities. It calibrates between-feature variation through shifting and scaling mechanism in which all the data are adjusted.

Huber et al. and Durbin et al. independently proposed the VSN approach which is a variant of the log-transform (glog2). A two-component model to explain the proportional increase in the variance with the mean intensity of the proteins was proposed [9], [17], [27]; yijkr=αijkr+μijkreη+εijkr, where αijkr is the background signal and μijkr=yijkr is the actual signal. η=Norm0,ση and εijkr=Norm0,σ2 are the proportional error and background error respectively. However, with background corrected data this can be modelled as yijkrμijkreη. A transformation h is used to produce values such that Varhyijkr is approximately independent of the mean, Ehyijkr. In general, for a matrix, μijkr the function implemented fits a normalisation transformation μijkrhμijkr=glog2μijkr-aibi where bi is the scaling parameter for array i which is always ensured to be positive with a parameter transformation f(b)=exp(b), ai is the background offset included if the data is not background corrected and glog2u=log2u+u2+1=arsinhu/log2 is the generalised transformation h. A robust variant of the maximum likelihood estimator for the 2 parameters is utilised [1]. Each slide is treated independently and slide to slide variation is not considered [10].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A