Formalin test: experimental design

RG Rosaria Greco
FS Francesca Siani
CD Chiara Demartini
AZ Annamaria Zanaboni
GN Giuseppe Nappi
SD Sergio Davinelli
GS Giovanni Scapagnini
CT Cristina Tassorelli
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The rats were randomly divided into groups of 6–8 animals, according to the following treatment schedule:

1) control group (n=8): saline (30′) + NTG vehicle, 12 ml/kg, i.p.

2) saline + NTG group (n=8): saline (30′) + NTG, 10 mg/kg, i.p.

3) AP 1 + NTG group (n=6): AP extract (30′), 50 mg/kg, i.p. + NTG;

4) AP 2 + NTG group (n=6): AP extract (30′), 25 mg/kg, i.p. + NTG.

In addition, to evaluate the possible interaction of AP extract with NTG vehicle we included another experimental group:

5) AP 1 + NTG vehicle group (n=6): AP extract (30′), 50 mg/kg, i.p. + NTG vehicle

AP or saline was administered 30 minutes (30′) before NTG or NTG vehicle injection. The formalin test was performed 4 hours after NTG or vehicle administration. The investigators responsible for the behavioral testing were blind to treatment group assignment. For the formalin test, a 100 μl volume of 1% formalin (formaldehyde diluted in 0.9% saline) was administered by intraplantar injection. Pain-related behavior was quantified for 1 h by counting spontaneous flinches and shakes of the injected paw: over 60-s periods for the first 5 min (min 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) and thereafter following 4-min pauses, for 60-s periods up to the hour. Phase I was defined as the period from 1 to 5 min, phase II was defined as the period from 15 to 60 min inclusive. Phase I is considered the result of chemical activation of nociceptors, whereas phase II reflects the inflammatory reaction and central processing (Tjølsen et al., 1992).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A