Elevated plus-maze (EPM) test and open field test (OFT)

QK Qiao-Qiao Kong
XT Xiao-Dan Tian
JW Jia Wang
HY Hong-Jie Yuan
SN Shu-Fen Ning
ML Ming-Jiu Luo
JT Jing-He Tan
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The device and procedures used for EPM and OFT tests were those reported previously7. The EPM device consisted of two open arms (30 × 6 cm), alternating at right angles with two closed arms (30 × 6 × 15 cm). The central platform delimited by the four arms was 36 cm2. The whole maze was elevated 50 cm above the floor. The OFT device consisted of a black square floor of 50 cm × 50 cm and white walls 45 cm tall. The floor was divided into 25 squares of 10 cm × 10 cm, of which those 16 squares touching a wall were designated as peripheral area and the 9 remaining squares as the central area.

The test room was maintained at 22–25 °C with continuously provided 50–55 dB white noises. Illumination levels were provided by four 36-W lamp tubes that give a light intensity of 357 lx. The tests were always performed between 8:00 and 11:00 a.m. Immediately before the test, mice were individually put in the test room for 30 min for them to habituate to the test environment. To begin EPM test, a mouse was placed on the central platform, facing an open arm, and was allowed to explore the maze for 5 min. Following a four-paw criterion, numbers of entries and time spent in each arm over the total exploration in both open and closed arms were calculated using an Any-maze software (Stoelting Co, Illinois, USA). The OFT was performed one week after the EPM test. To start the OFT test, a mouse was placed in the central area and was allowed to explore the open field for 5 min. Then the numbers of central entries, time spent in central area and distance traveled in the open field were calculated using the Any-maze software. The % of central distance (cD)/total distance (tD) of OFT was calculated by dividing the total distance a mouse traveled during the 5 min test by the distance it traveled within the central area. After each trial, the device was cleaned with 10% ethanol to effectively remove the scent of the previously tested animal.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A