Senescence associated (SA)‐β‐galactosidase staining

AK Amanpreet Kaur
JL Jun Yi Stanley Lim
SS Sugunavathi Sepramaniam
SP Siddhi Patnaik
NH Nathan Harmston
ML May Ann Lee
EP Enrico Petretto
DV David M Virshup
BM Babita Madan
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Fresh frozen OCT‐embedded tumor tissues were cut into 8 µm thick sections. The sections were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde with 0.125% glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature for 5 min and rinsed with 1× PBS containing 2 mM MgCl2. Thereafter, sections were incubated with X‐gal containing staining solution from senescence detection kit (Abcam ab65351) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The sections were counterstained with nuclear fast red (NFR) for 5 min. Slides were mounted in mounting media containing gelatin and glycerol. Brightfield images were acquired at 10× magnification using Nikon Ni‐E microscope with DS‐Ri2 camera. Multiple fields were imaged per tissue section from three tumor samples per treatment group. Quantifications were performed using Fiji ImageJ software. Briefly, color deconvolution was performed to segregate the SA‐β‐galactosidase (blue stain)‐positive tissue. Image threshold values were calculated and set to measure the percentage area covered by the entire tissue (NFR stained pink regions) and SA‐β‐galactosidase‐positive (blue stained) tissue. Percentage of SA‐β‐galactosidase‐positive tissue area was calculated, and individual values were plotted with GraphPad Prism. Statistical significance was calculated by Mann–Whitney unpaired 2‐tailed t‐test, and P‐value of < 0.05 was considered a significant difference.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A