18F-Flutemetamol amyloid-PET imaging

JS Jolien M. Schaeverbeke
SG Silvy Gabel
KM Karen Meersmans
EL Emma S. Luckett
SM Steffi De Meyer
KA Katarzyna Adamczuk
NN Natalie Nelissen
VG Valerie Goovaerts
AR Ahmed Radwan
SS Stefan Sunaert
PD Patrick Dupont
KL Koen Van Laere
RV Rik Vandenberghe
ask Ask a question
Favorite

All participants underwent 18F-flutemetamol PET on a 16-slice Biograph PET/CT scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The tracer was injected as a bolus in an antecubital vein (mean activity 150 MBq, SD 5 MBq, range 134–162 MBq). Scan acquisition started 90 min after tracer injection and lasted for 30 min [27, 40]. Prior to PET acquisition, a low-dose CT scan of the head was performed for attenuation correction. Random and scatter correction were applied. Data were recorded in list mode and reconstructed into six 5-min frames using ordered subsets expectation maximization (four iterations × 16 subsets). Processing of 18F-flutemetamol PET was done using SPM8 running on Matlab R2012b as described in detail elsewhere [27]. A standardized uptake value ratio image (SUVR) was calculated using participant-specific cerebellar grey matter as a reference region (grey matter threshold: 0.3). Mean 18F-flutemetamol SUVR values were calculated for a composite region (SUVR comp), which consisted out of five bilateral cortical regions: frontal, parietal, anterior cingulate, precuneus-posterior cingulate and lateral temporal. These regions were derived from the Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas [41] and intersected with the participant-specific grey matter, thresholded at 0.3. In a next step, SUVR comp values were converted to Centiloids (CLs) [42] using as conversion formula CL = 127.6 × SUVR - 149. Low or absent amyloid burden was defined as CL ≤10 CL, intermediate amyloid burden as CL between 10 and 50 and high amyloid burden as CL ≥50 [43].

For whole-brain voxelwise analyses, 18F-flutemetamol SUVR images were smoothed with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 8 ×8×8 mm3 FWHM.

Sixty-eight participants received 18F-flutemetamol PET prior to a major scanner upgrade (on 14/03/2012), while the remaining 112 received 18F-flutemetamol PET after the upgrade date. The scanner upgrade effect was included as a dummy variable in voxelwise statistical models.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A