Test of Gross Motor Development

Luka Šlosar
EB Eling D. de Bruin
EF Eduardo Bodnariuc Fontes
MP Matej Plevnik
RP Rado Pisot
BS Bostjan Simunic
UM Uros Marusic
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The test of gross motor development (TGMD-3) measures 13 fundamental motor skills, subdivided into two subscales: locomotor and ball skills. The two subscales scores are combined to form the Gross Motor composite. Performance evaluation was performed according to the Ulrich (2000) protocol. The assessment was performed only at BDC and POST. Only raw scores were taken into the analysis. All performances were videotaped and later analyzed by two independent researchers. The reliability of measurements was established according to Vernadakis et al. (2015). Specifically, 30% of children’s scores at BDC and POST were analyzed for between researchers (BR) and between days (BD; day1 and day10) reliability by using the intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) (with 95% confidential intervals). ICC values were interpreted as proposed by Malcata et al. (2014) as follows: >0.99, extremely high; 0.99–0.90, very high; 0.75–0.90, high; 0.50–0.75, moderate; 0.20–0.50, low; and <0.20, very low. The ICC(2,1) revealed a very high reliability between researchers (BR – day1) in both measurements (ICCPRE–TEST = 0.894; ICCPOST–TEST = 0.877). Very high ICCs(3,1) were also confirmed for between-day (BD – day1:day10) reliability (ICCPRE–TEST = 0.881; ICCPOST–TEST = 0.891). In all ICCs, the 95% CI ranged from 0.863 to 0.899.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A