We calculated the F0, V0, and Pmax as basic indicators of the relationship between F and V (F-V relationship) across the six different loads (Fig. 3). We defined the points of intersection of the regression line with the ordinate and transversal axis as F0, and V0, respectively, and calculated Pmax as described in an earlier study (Jaric, 2015; Samozino et al., 2012; Vandewalle et al., 1987) by using the following equation:
The average values (A) and individual values (B). Force-velocity relationship and parameters derived from each of the two relationships of gymnasts (the closed circle) and judo athletes (the open circle).
Pmax = F0 × V0 / 4.
In addition to the absolute values, we expressed F0 and Pmax as values relative to CSAindex (F0/CSAindex and Pmax/CSAindex). Furthermore, we adopted the slope of the regression line for the F-V relationship (F-Vslope) as a parameter indicative of predominance of force (or velocity) in the relationship (Samozino et al., 2012). To evaluate the test-retest reliability of ballistic power testing, each subject was tested on 2 separate occasions at the same time of day after an interval at least 3 days. The same warm-up routine and testing protocol were used in both occasions. To determine the test-retest reliability across the two testing sessions, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 1,1) was used. There was no significant difference between the two testing sessions in each of F0, V0 and Pmax. The ICC(1,1) for each of the measured parameters ranged from 0.820 to 0.984.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.