Sample size calculation

DO Dennis Ougrin
BW Ben Hoi-ching Wong
MV Mehrak Vaezinejad
PP Paul L. Plener
TM Tauseef Mehdi
LR Liana Romaniuk
EB Elizabeth Barrett
HH Haseena Hussain
AL Alexandra Lloyd
JT Jovanka Tolmac
MR Manish Rao
SC Sulagna Chakrabarti
SC Sara Carucci
OM Omer S. Moghraby
RE Rachel Elvins
FR Farah Rozali
ES Ereni Skouta
FM Fiona McNicholas
NK Natalie Kuruppuaracchi
DS Dejan Stevanovic
PN Peter Nagy
CD Chiara Davico
HM Hassan Mirza
ET Evren Tufan
FY Fatima Youssef
BM Ben Meadowcroft
SL Sabine Landau
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The two main outcomes of interest in this study were (a) frequency of hospital presentation and (b) proportion of presentations with severe self-harm out of all hospital presentations for self-harm. To address (a) we simply collected presentations from as many different areas as possible within the available data collection period. To address (b) we used evidence from one London emergency department obtained in March 2020 that suggested that while the number of presentations might be reduced to a quarter the number in 2019, within those with presentations for self-harm the proportion of severe self-harm might have increased from around 8% in 2019 to around 40% in 2020. Based on a two-sided Fisher’s exact test with significance level 5% and a power requirement of 90% we calculated that a minimum of 84 self-harm presentations in 2019 and 21 self-harm presentations in 2020 would be required to detect such an effect within a hospital area.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A