Outcome instruments of interest

KK Kari Kanto
TL Tuomas Lähdeoja
MP Mika Paavola
PA Pasi Aronen
TJ Teppo L. N. Järvinen
JJ Jarkko Jokihaara
CA Clare L. Ardern
TK Teemu V. Karjalainen
ST Simo Taimela
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Shoulder pain intensity during the previous 24 h was assessed on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain) (Fig. S1 in the supplementary appendix). Pain at rest and on arm activity were measured separately.

The Constant-Murley score [18] comprises measures of capacity (range of motion and strength) and subjective parameters (pain assessment, work load, and leisure time activities), which yield a score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Although the Constant-Murley score is one of the most frequently cited instruments, it does not have convincing evidence for its psychometric properties [20].

The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) [17], consists of 12 questions of shoulder status and function, with yes (1) or no (0) response options. Answers are summed for a score ranging from 0 to 12, with maximum score indicating normal shoulder function. The Simple Shoulder Test has good evidence in support of internal consistency, reliability, structural validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness [20].

Participants were asked their subjective satisfaction to treatment outcome relative to baseline at the 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up visits on a five-point global rating of change (GRC) scale (Table 1).

Global Rating of Change response optionsa

aParticipants were instructed to choose the answer that best represented their current situation. The answer options 1–5 have been translated from Finnish to English

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A