The scoring system used was adapted from the CRM handbook [33] and is provided as Table S1. Each interview transcript was scored to give a readiness level for the five dimensions, using a nine-point rating scale; 1 (No awareness), 2 (Denial/Resistance), 3 (Vague Awareness), 4 (Preplanning), 5 (Preparation), 6 (Initiation), 7 (Stabilization), 8 (Expansion/Confirmation), and 9 (Community ownership). The interview transcripts were scored by two raters independently following the CRM scoring system (Table S1) [33]. According to the CRM handbook, the main aim of scoring the data by raters is to efficiently apply the scoring system (Table S1) to the data collected. Although, the self-reported respondent data (Table S2) provides interesting insights into community perceptions, for allocating readiness scores to dimensions only consensus scores by raters are relied upon [33].
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.