Published literature was retrieved through searches in five electronic bibliographic databases (The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and SCOPUS) from 1 January 1964 to 30 November 2020. Subject headings and key MeSH terms included “national recommendations”, “clinical practice guidelines”, “diabetes mellitus”, “pregnancy”, “gestational diabetes mellitus”, “screening”, “diagnosis”, “one step” and “two step”. The search strategy was based on three key concepts: (1) pregnancy (study population); (2) GDM (exposure); and (3) screening and diagnostic parameters (outcome). Restrictions for language (limited to English and/or French materials) and geographic location (Canada; limited to national-level recommendations) were applied. In addition, the reference lists of all identified CPGs were examined to identify other Canadian national guidelines not captured in our search. The electronic search and the eligibility of the guidelines were independently assessed by two reviewers (JM, KD) and discrepancies were resolved through discussion.
In addition, several interviews were conducted with one of the co-authors (SM) to discuss the history of GDM screening and aid in the identification of key Canadian guidelines over the years. SM served as the Steering committee co-chair in the development of the 1998 DC CPG for the management of diabetes in Canada; she holds extensive, substantive knowledge on the diagnostic criteria recommended by Canadian CPGs over the years.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.