Quality evaluation

LF Li Feng
ZW Zhicong Wang
LJ Li Jing
ZZ Zhiguo Zhou
SS Shuai Shi
RD Ruoying Deng
YL Yibing Liu
QM Qingju Meng
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The quality of the RCTs was evaluated on the modified Jadad scale [9]. This covers random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, loss to follow-up, and withdrawal. The total score is seven, with four to seven indicating high-quality research and less than 4 being indicating low-quality research.

The quality scores of the non-RCTs were evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [10].

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A