2.10. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

FR Federica Rinaldi
LM Linda Maurizi
AC Antonietta Lucia Conte
MM Massimiliano Marazzato
AM Alessandro Maccelli
MC Maria Elisa Crestoni
PH Patrizia Nadia Hanieh
JF Jacopo Forte
MC Maria Pia Conte
CZ Carlo Zagaglia
CL Catia Longhi
CM Carlotta Marianecci
MA Maria Grazia Ammendolia
MC Maria Carafa
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To visualize the effect of the selected SEO NEs on the morphology of bacterial strains and the inhibition of biofilm formation, SEM was performed. The NEs were added to selected different biofilm producers at 1 and ½ of relative MIC concentrations. A 1 mL sample from each tube was seeded onto glass slides in 24-wells culture plates and incubated for 48 h. Samples were then washed twice with PBS (pH 7.4) and suspended in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (v/v) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). After overnight fixation at +4 °C and washing with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, samples were post-fixed with 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), dehydrated in ethanol–water mixture with increasing ethanol concentrations (35%, 50%, 70%, 85%, 95%, and 100%), and dried with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) to remove fluids. Dehydrated specimens were gold-sputtered and observed by ultra-high resolution field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Secondary electron images were performed with an acceleration voltage of 20 KV. The images were processed for display using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A