The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) [13] was administered to the participants in its Spanish version, which was adapted and validated by Expósito et al. [13]. This instrument has 22 items on ambivalent sexism (α Cronbach = 0.90), which is made up of two scales: The first scale contains 11 items referring to hostile sexism (α Cronbach = 0.89) (i.e., “Young men should exert control over who their girlfriends interact with”), and the second scale contains the remaining 11 items related to benevolent sexism (α Cronbach = 0.86) (i.e., “A boy will feel incomplete if he is not dating a girl”). The item response format is based on a Likert-type scale with response options ranging from 0 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”), where higher scores represent higher levels of sexism. See Appendix A and Appendix B.
Sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, country, and religious affiliation were measured. The variable “age” was centered using the mean since the value of 0 was not included in the study sample. In relation to the “religious identity”, this variable initially was composed by the following categories: “Hindu”, “Evangelical or Protestant”, “Catholic”, “None and I don’t believe in God”, “None, but I believe in God”, and “Other”. Due to the low frequency in most of its categories, firstly this variable was recodified in four categories to describe the sample: “Catholic”, “None and I don’t believe in God”, “None, but I believe in God”, and “Other (Hindu, Evangelical or Protestant, etc.)”. Finally, this variable was dichotomized to carry out the regression analyses giving the value of 1 to the category “Catholic” and the value of 0 to “others”, which resulted from merging all the remaining categories. Similarly, the variable “marital status” was recoded to dichotomous (1 = single; 0 = other) given the low frequency of the other response categories such as “widower”, “separated or divorced”, and “common law or common-law partnership”. All of them were unified in the category “other”.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.