ChIP-seq mapping (Figures S1 and S2)

MR Maša Roller
ES Ericca Stamper
DV Diego Villar
OI Osagie Izuogu
FM Fergal Martin
AR Aisling M. Redmond
RR Raghavendra Ramachanderan
LH Louise Harewood
DO Duncan T. Odom
PF Paul Flicek
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Reads were mapped to each species’ genome with BWA-MEM version 0.7.12 [62] using the default parameters, including the option to discard any alignment that has more than 10 thousand exact matches in the genome (−c 10,000). For all reads mapping to less than 10 thousand locations, the location with the highest mapping score was reported by BWA-MEM, or, in the case of multiple locations with the same score, a randomly selected location. Therefore, all reads with an exact repeat in 9999 other genomic locations would not have been used for downstream analyses, while reads with a smaller number of exact repeats might have been misplaced in the genome. Low-quality mapping reads were filtered out using SAMtools view version 1.3 with the -q1 flag [63]. Duplicates were removed with the Picard Tools MarkDuplicates program version 2.8.3 (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Mapping statistics were calculated using SAMtools flagstat version 1.3. To estimate the signal-to-noise ratio, we checked that the relative strand correlation (RSC) was above 0.8 for all libraries using Phantompeakqual tools version 1.14 [64]. The mapping and RSC results are available in Additional file 3: Table S3.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A