Comparison of Moraxella osloensis and Enhydrobacter aerosaccus

ZL Zhiming Li
JX Jingjing Xia
LJ Liuyiqi Jiang
YT Yimei Tan
YA Yitai An
XZ Xingyu Zhu
JR Jie Ruan
ZC Zhihua Chen
HZ Hefu Zhen
YM Yanyun Ma
ZJ Zhuye Jie
LX Liang Xiao
HY Huanming Yang
JW Jian Wang
KK Karsten Kristiansen
XX Xun Xu
LJ Li Jin
CN Chao Nie
JK Jean Krutmann
XL Xiao Liu
JW Jiucun Wang
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

To assess if the previously reported Enhydrobacter aerosaccus is, in fact, Moraxella osloensis, we used the following methods: (1) We downloaded 16S sequences of Moraxella osloensis (NR_104936.1) and Enhydrobacter aerosaccus (MH715214.1) from NCBI, the two sequences were aligned by BLASTN (v2.7.1, default parameters except that -evalue 1e-10 outfmt 6 -word_size 16), and found that the similarity between them can reach 99.450%. (2) We aligned the sequences annotated as Enhydrobacter in Greengene [49] with NCBI-NT using BLASTN and found that 78.9% of the sequences were annotated as Moraxella osloensis. (3) Using the same method, we found that 99.4% of the sequences annotated as Enhydrobacter in the MetaPhlAn2 [72] database were annotated as Moraxella osloensis.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A