Data visualization

AC Alisa W. Coffin
DO Dawn M. Olson
LS Lynne Seymour
DB David D. Bosch
JS Jason M. Schmidt
TS Timothy C. Strickland
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Visualization of the data allowed for the comparison of results using mapping displays. Soils, terrain, and the coefficients from GWR models were interpolated and displayed. Mapped surfaces of coefficient values were overlaid with values of estimated credence. To properly display the surfaces and values together, a geometric classification scheme was used to symbolize coefficient raster surfaces, while estimations of credence (i.e. C:SE) were symbolized as points, using a manual classification, relying on Chebyshev’s theorem [59] to indicate values of: high levels of credence (<-3; >3), some credence (-3 to -2; 2 to 3) and little credence (>-2 to <2). Color-coded graphics were used to compare changes over time in both the study area, broadly, and in the values of specific points. The visual inspection of maps and charted data provided interpretable figures from which conclusions could be drawn.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A