EV glycan sample preparation for capillary electrophoresis-laser-induced fluorescence (CE-LIF) analysis

JG Jonathan Gobin
GM Gauri Muradia
JM Jelica Mehic
CW Carole Westwood
LC Lauren Couvrette
AS Andrew Stalker
SB Stewart Bigelow
CL Christian C. Luebbert
FB Frédéric St-Denis Bissonnette
MJ Michael J. W. Johnston
SS Simon Sauvé
RT Roger Y. Tam
LW Lisheng Wang
MR Michael Rosu-Myles
JL Jessie R. Lavoie
ask Ask a question
Favorite

The EV samples used for the capillary electrophoresis-laser-induced fluorescence (CE-LIF) analysis were the same as the ones prepared for the NTA analysis described in the “Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) of EVs using the NanoSight NS300” section. From the 1-mL EV sample, a 20-μL aliquot was used for the EV glycan sample preparation. This 20-μL EV aliquot was dried down in a vacuum concentrator and resuspended in 10 μL of double deionized water (ddiH2O). The EV samples were processed using the Sciex Fast Glycan Labeling and Analysis Kit (Sciex, cat.#B94499) for denaturation, enzymatic glycan release (PNGase F, 500 NEB units) (New England Biolabs, cat.#P0704), fluorophore labeling (8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonate; APTS) (Sciex, cat.#B94507), and excess dye removal by magnetic beads. The CE-LIF analysis was performed using a Beckman Coulter (Sciex) PA800 Plus Pharmaceutical Analysis System equipped with a solid state laser-induced fluorescence detector (λex = 488 nm/λem = 520 nm). CE consumables were purchased from Sciex. Analytical reagent grade acetonitrile (ACN) and 2-propanol (IPA) were purchased from Merck KGaA. Ammonium acetate and acetic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All separations were carried out using a background electrolyte (BGE) consisting of 7.5 mM ammonium acetate pH 4.5, 10% isopropanol in a 50-cm effective length (60 cm total length), 50 μm ID polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-coated capillary. The separation voltage was set to 30 kV in reversed polarity mode (cathode at injection side) and the separation temperature was set to 20 °C. Sample injection was performed hydrodynamically by applying 0.5pSi forward pressure for 10 s (~ 9 nL). 32Karat (Sciex, version 10.1) was used for data acquisition and processing. The traces for comparison of the glycan profiles were normalized to the internal standard (maltotriose) and y-axes were scaled to account for the concentration differences obtained by NTA.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A