4.7. Immunofluorescence Analysis

JB Janik Böhnke
SP Sandra Pinkert
MS Maria Schmidt
HB Hans Binder
NB Nicole Christin Bilz
MJ Matthias Jung
UR Uta Reibetanz
AB Antje Beling
DR Dan Rujescu
CC Claudia Claus
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For immunofluorescence analysis, iPSCs were cultivated in 24 well plates and fixed with 2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde. Staining of surface expressed DAF and CAR was carried out without permeabilization, whereas F-actin staining with Alexa Fluor 555 phalloidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a 1:40 dilution was applied after permeabilization with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS. After blocking of unspecific binding with goat or donkey serum, anti-CAR (#sc-15405 H-300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology or clone RmcB) or anti-DAF (#sc-133220 H-7, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies were applied at a dilution of 1:100 followed by addition of goat anti-rabbit or donkey anti-mouse IgG (H + L) Cy3 MinX secondary antibodies (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany). Addition of primary and secondary antibodies and phalloidin dye was followed by application of the DNA-specific stain Hoechst bisbenzimide 33258 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 5 µg/mL in PBS. Immunofluorescence analysis of CAR with clone H-300 was done in reference to our previous publication [23], which showed differential surface expression of CAR on TMOi001-A and WISCi004-A iPSC. This was complemented by the application of the well-characterized RmcB clone, which was also used for antibody blocking experiments. Supplementary Figure S2 shows a representative flowcytometric analysis on the lack of fluorescence signal after application of the donkey anti-mouse Cy3 secondary antibody. Images were taken with an Olympus XM10 fluorescence microscope and processed for minimal alterations in contrast and background in CorelDRAW2020.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A