Py-GC-MS analysis and tube furnace tests were performed to determine the composition of pyrolysis gas released from the sample. He was the carrier in all analyses and tests. The sample was heated at 10°C/min. The released pyrolysis gas was collected in controlled temperature ranges of 150°C-440°C for PMMA and 440°C-650°C for PC.
The Py-GC-MS analysis was performed in two setups by combining one pyrolyzer and two GC-MS instruments. One setup consisted of a pyrolyzer manufactured by Frontier Laboratories Limited (model number: EGA / PY-3030D) and a GC-MS instrument manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation (model number: GCMS QP2010 Ultra). Another setup consisted of a pyrolyzer of the same model number and a GC-MS instrument manufactured by Agilent Technologies Incorporated (model number: GC / MS 5977B). Each Py-GC-MS analysis used a ~0.1 mg sample. The GC column was a weakly polar wall-coated open-tubular column manufactured by Frontier Laboratories (model number: UA5 (MS / HT) -15M-0.25F). The column was heated at 40°C for 5 min after gas introduction and then to 320°C at a rate of 15°C/min. MS was performed in scan modes ranging from m/z = 2–800.
The tube furnace tests were performed to quantify CO, CO2, and CH4 that were unsuitable for the Py-GC-MS analysis. In the test, ~0.3 g sample was heated in a tube furnace, and pyrolysis gas was collected in a gas bag by a He carrier gas. The collected gas was analyzed using two GC devices. The first was a Hitachi device (model number: G-3000) to quantify CO and CH4, and the other, a different model from the same company (model number: 263–30), quantified CO2.
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.