Confirmation of Data Using RT-qPCR

FG Felix Grünberger
RR Robert Reichelt
IW Ingrid Waege
VN Verena Ned
KB Korbinian Bronner
MK Marcell Kaljanac
NW Nina Weber
ZA Zubeir El Ahmad
LK Lena Knauss
MM M. Gregor Madej
CZ Christine Ziegler
DG Dina Grohmann
WH Winfried Hausner
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

RT-qPCR reactions were performed similar as described previously (Reichelt et al., 2018). In short, total isolated RNA was reverse transcribed using the ProtoScript® II First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (NEB), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and using a random primer mix (Promega). The reactions were assembled in triplicates using the qPCRBio SyGreen Mix Lo-Rox Kit (PCR Biosystems) with reverse transcribed cDNA from the first step in a 1:10 dilution, including a control reaction that lacked the reverse transcriptase (-RT) and a no template control (NTC). RT-qPCR reactions were run on a Rotor-Gene Q cycler (Qiagen) in a three-step protocol: 95°C – 10’ for one cycle; 95°C – 30”, 58°C – 30”, 72°C – 30” for 40 cycles. Data evaluation was done using the corresponding Rotor-Gene Q software package (Qiagen). Relative expression levels were calculated using the delta-delta Ct method (2–ΔΔCt), by comparing the Ct values from biological triplicates of the gene of interest to a house-keeping gene pf0256. The applicability of pf0256 as a calibrator was evaluated before (Reichelt et al., 2018). Accordingly, all primer efficiencies were tested and only primers with efficiencies between 90 and 110% further used in the experiments.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

0/150

tip Tips for asking effective questions

+ Description

Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A