Flow cytometry, sorting, and intracellular transcription factor staining

HK H.-F. Koay
SS S. Su
DA D. Amann-Zalcenstein
SD S. R. Daley
IC I. Comerford
LM L. Miosge
CW C. E. Whyte
IK I. E. Konstantinov
Yd Y. d’Udekem
TB T. Baldwin
PH P. F. Hickey
SB S. P. Berzins
JM J. Y. W. Mak
YS Y. Sontani
CR C. M. Roots
TS T. Sidwell
AK A. Kallies
ZC Z. Chen
SN S. Nüssing
KK K. Kedzierska
LM L. K. Mackay
SM S. R. McColl
ED E. K. Deenick
DF D. P. Fairlie
JM J. McCluskey
CG C. C. Goodnow
MR M. E. Ritchie
GB G. T. Belz
SN S. H. Naik
DP D. G. Pellicci
DG D. I. Godfrey
request Request a Protocol
ask Ask a question
Favorite

Mouse and human cells were stained with viability dye 7-aminoactinomycin D (Sigma-Aldrich) and cell surface antibodies concurrently with MR1-tetramers, at room temperature (RT) for 30 min. A list of antibodies used is detailed in table S4. Transcription factors were assessed by staining with antibodies after the cells were surface-stained and permeabilized with the eBioscience Foxp3 Fixation/Permeabilization kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apart from intracellular analysis, mouse cells were analyzed unfixed after staining, whereas human cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. Analysis was carried out using a BD LSRFortessa equipped with a 561-nm yellow-green laser, and data were processed using FlowJo software (TreeStar). Mouse cells are gated on B220 lymphocytes and human cells on CD14CD19 lymphocytes after dead cell and doublet exclusion. Flow cytometric sorting for live, unfixed bulk (100 cells) or single cells was performed using a BD FACSAria III cell sorter. Flow cytometry gating strategy is shown in fig. S10.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A