Confocal laser-scanning microscopy

VM Venkat Giri Magupalli
RN Roberto Negro
YT Yuzi Tian
AH Arthur V. Hauenstein
GC Giuseppe Di Caprio
WS Wesley Skillern
QD Qiufang Deng
PO Pontus Orning
HA Hasan B. Alam
ZM Zoltan Maliga
HS Humayun Sharif
JH Jun Jacob Hu
CE Charles L. Evavold
JK Jonathan C. Kagan
FS Florian I. Schmidt
KF Katherine A. Fitzgerald
TK Tom Kirchhausen
YL Yongqing Li
HW Hao Wu
ask Ask a question
Favorite

For imaging fixed cells, THP-1 cells or iBMDMs were seeded at a density of 2 × 105/ml. Eight to 12 hours after transfection, HEK293T cells were washed once with 1× BRB80 buffer, fixed, and analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy. After activation, THP-1 and iBMDMs were washed once with 1× BRB buffer, fixed, and labeled with antibodies, as described in the immunolabeling and antibodies section. Confocal sections were obtained using an Olympus FV-1000 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Olympus America, Waltham, MA) with Olympus Fluoview version 3.0 software, using 405-nm excitation/425- to 475-nm emission, 488-nm excitation/500- to 545-nm emission, 559-nm excitation/575- to 620-nm emission, and 635-nm excitation/655- to 755-nm emission laser lines.

Images (512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024) were collected at 4 μs/pixel using a 20× [0.75 numerical aperture (NA), air objective], 40× (0.95 NA, air objective), 40× (1.15 NA, water-immersion objective), or 60× (1.2 NA, water-immersion objective) lenses. The images were identically acquired and processed using Adobe Photoshop software. Distributions of fluorescence intensities and colocalization were analyzed by Velocity version 6.2.1 software.

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A